Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2020] UGHCEBD 10

Lukwago v Talenga T/a Mashall Agents and Court Bailliffs

Lukwago v Talenga T/a Mashall Agents and Court Bailliffs (Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 64 of 2019) [2020] UGHCEBD 10 (26 August 2020)

The High Court reviewed and set aside a taxed bailiff’s bill said to be grossly exaggerated and illegal, ordering a refund and sanctions.

  • Review Of Taxation
  • Court Bailiff Fees
  • Execution Of Decrees
  • Illegality In Costs
  • Abuse Of Court Process
  • Review-of-taxation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2003] UGSC 54

Bamu Partners and Auctioneers v Attorney General

Bamu Partners and Auctioneers v Attorney General (Civil Appeal 3 of 2002) [2003] UGSC 54 (11 March 2003)

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal over costs for attachment of shares, holding the appellant had not proved compliance with the mandatory attachment procedure.

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Attachment Of Shares
  • Execution Of Judgments
  • Court Bailiff Fees
  • Attachment-of-shares
  • Taxation-of-costs
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2003] UGSC 1

Bamu Partners and Auctioneers v Attorney General

Bamu Partners and Auctioneers v Attorney General (Civil Appeal 3 of 2002) [2003] UGSC 1 (10 March 2003)

The Supreme Court held that the appellant failed to prove lawful attachment of shares under Order 19 rule 43, so its claim for bailiff fees failed.

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Attachment Of Shares
  • Execution Of Judgments
  • Court Bailiff Fees
  • Taxation-of-costs
  • Attachment-of-shares
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [1998] UGHC 37

Non-Performing Assets Recovery Trust v Kidega Lakititus

Non-Performing Assets Recovery Trust v Kidega Lakititus (CIVIL APPEALS NOs. 899, 901,902, 903, 904 and 905 Of 1998) [1998] UGHC 37 (24 May 1998)

The High Court dismissed consolidated appeals as time-barred, holding time ran from the ruling date, not the later signed order date. It also noted the attachment orders were a nullity.

  • Appeal Time Limits
  • Execution Of Decrees
  • Court Bailiff Fees
  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Appeal-time-limits
  • Execution-of-decrees
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.