Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2020] EACJ 45

Secretary General of East African Community v Zziwa (Taxation Reference No.1 of 2019)

Secretary General of East African Community v Zziwa (Taxation Reference No.1 of 2019) [2020] EACJ 45 (19 June 2020) (First Instance Division)

The Court partly allowed a taxation reference, reducing excessive instruction fees while leaving VAT and disbursements untouched.

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Instruction Fees
  • Court Discretion
  • Costs Award Consistency
  • Vat On Legal Fees
  • Taxation-of-costs
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2013] UGSC 26

Concorp International Limited v Eastern & Southern Trade & Development Bank

Concorp International Limited v Eastern & Southern Trade & Development Bank (Civil Reference 4 of 2012) [2013] UGSC 26 (28 March 2013)

The Supreme Court held that the Taxing Officer exercised her discretion properly and applied the correct principles under Rule 9(2) of the Third Schedule. The instruction fee awarded was based on the nature of the appeal, which was limited to a preliminary point of law and not the merits or monetary value of the underlying suit. The applicant's argument to base instruction fees on the value of the loan was rejected, as the issue before the court did not involve determination of the subject matter's value. The court found no manifest error or injustice in the amount awarded and declined to int…

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Instruction Fees
  • Preliminary Objection
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Costs Award Consistency
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] EACJ 62

Attorney General of Kenya v Nyongo and Others (Taxation Reference No.5 of 2010)

Attorney General of Kenya v Nyongo and Others (Taxation Reference No.5 of 2010) [2011] EACJ 62 (23 February 2011) (First Instance Division)

The court found that the taxing officer failed to justify the award of USD 450,000 as instruction fees, making no serious attempt to explain the substantial increase from the minimum prescribed fee. Applying the principles from PREMCHAND RAICHAND and Rule 9(1), the court held that the assessment was not reasonable or fair, and that the award was inconsistent with previous awards and judicial practice. The court determined that an award of USD 250,000 would be just and proportionate in the circumstances, and substituted this amount. The court also ordered that each party bear its own costs, co…

  • Taxation Of Costs
  • Instruction Fees
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Review Of Taxing Officer
  • Costs Award Consistency
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.