Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ndayishimye v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 222 of 2019) [2025] UGCA 141 (14 May 2025)
The Court of Appeal upheld a conviction and 30-year sentence for aggravated defilement, finding the victim’s testimony and medical evidence sufficient.
Tusingwire v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 493 of 2017) [2024] UGCA 230 (30 August 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that corroboration of the victim's testimony in sexual offences is not a legal requirement if the court finds the witness credible and reliable. The trial Judge correctly relied on the victim's immediate report to the LC1 Chairman and her consistent testimony, supported by circumstantial evidence such as the appellant's flight from the village. The medical report was inconclusive, but its absence of injuries was explained by the victim's pregnancy and lack of resistance. The plea taking procedure was properly conducted, with the charge and particulars explained in the…
Source excerpt
Male v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 379 of 2019) [2023] UGCA 216 (14 August 2023)
The Court of Appeal found that the trial Judge properly evaluated the evidence, and the conviction for aggravated defilement was supported by corroborated testimony from the victim and her mother, as well as medical evidence. The appellant's alibi was disproved by credible identification evidence. The court reaffirmed that corroboration in sexual offences is not strictly required if the court warns itself and finds the complainant truthful. On sentencing, the court held that the trial Judge erred by failing to deduct the remand period as mandated by Article 23(8) of the Constitution and Princ…
Source excerpt
Misanvu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 65 of 2019) [2023] UGCA 190 (1 August 2023)
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge properly evaluated both the prosecution and defence evidence, relying not only on the victim's testimony but also on medical and corroborative witness evidence. The appellant's arguments regarding the indictment and lack of corroboration were dismissed as unfounded. The court reaffirmed that a conviction for rape can be based on the credible testimony of the complainant, supported by medical evidence. On sentencing, the court held that the trial judge lawfully deducted the remand period from the sentence and imposed a term well below the statutor…
Source excerpt
Kawesa Ivan v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 404 of 2019) [2022] UGCA 283 (1 December 2022)
The Court found that the conviction for aggravated defilement was safe, as the evidence of the victim and corroborating witness (PW2) was sufficient to prove the offence beyond reasonable doubt, and the contradiction in dates was a minor error clarified by sworn testimony. Corroboration was not mandatory for sworn evidence, and the absence of police testimony did not undermine the prosecution's case. Allegations of torture and illegal detention were not properly raised before the trial court and thus could not be grounds for appellate intervention. However, the Court held that the sentence of…
Source excerpt
Uganda v Opolot Joseph (Criminal Case 61 of 2021) [2022] UGHC 56 (20 October 2022)
The High Court convicted Opolot Joseph of aggravated defilement of his daughter and imposed a custodial sentence after finding the victim and medical evidence credible.
Gidudu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 842 of 2014) [2021] UGCA 186 (22 December 2021)
The Court of Appeal, as a first appellate court, reappraised the evidence and found that the prosecution's case was undermined by material contradictions between the testimonies of the victim and her sister regarding whether the appellant performed sexual acts in the presence of the sister. The medical evidence did not corroborate the victim's account, as no injuries or signs of recent sexual activity were found. The court held that these contradictions, coupled with the lack of medical corroboration and the appellant's consistent denial, raised reasonable doubt as to the appellant's guilt. A…
Source excerpt
Kitongo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2019) [2021] UGHCCRD 8 (9 February 2021)
The High Court allowed a criminal appeal, quashed a defilement conviction, and set aside a four-year sentence after finding key proof of age and evidential issues.
Ssenyomo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal Number. 0051 of 2012.) [2018] UGCA 41 (30 July 2018)
The Court of Appeal upheld Ssenyomo Charles’s conviction for aggravated defilement but reduced his sentence from life imprisonment to 16 years.
Ntambala v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 34 of 2015) [2018] UGSC 83 (18 January 2018)
The Supreme Court found that the Court of Appeal properly re-evaluated the evidence presented at trial, including the testimonies of the victim (PW4), corroborating witnesses (PW5, PW7), and medical evidence. The alleged contradiction regarding the number of used condoms was immaterial to the central issue of whether sexual intercourse occurred. The trial judge found the complainant to be a truthful witness, and the appellate court correctly applied the law on corroboration, noting that a conviction can be based on the testimony of a single witness if found credible. The Court further held th…
Source excerpt
