Uganda Case Law

Registered Trustees of South Rwenzori Diocese v Kabukero Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd

Registered Trustees of South Rwenzori Diocese v Kabukero Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 254 of 2018) [2025] UGCA 213 (25 June 2025)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 254 of 2018

Judge

Dr. F. Zeija, DCJ, Cheborion-Barishaki, JA, Esta Nambayo, JA/JCC

The Court of Appeal held that the respondent lacked locus standi because it was not in legal existence when the cause of action arose, and allowed the appeal with costs.

• Locus Standi
• Corporate Capacity
• Trespass To Land
• Powers Of Attorney
• Locus-standi
• Corporate-capacity

National Agricultural Research Organisation v Mountian of the Moon University and 2 Others

National Agricultural Research Organisation v Mountian of the Moon University and 2 Others (Civil Suit 14 of 2021) [2023] UGHCLD 202 (8 June 2023)

Court

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Case number

Civil Suit 14 of 2021

Judge

Wagona, J

The High Court held that National Agricultural Research Organisation had locus standi to sue over the disputed land and overruled the defendants’ preliminary objection.

• Locus Standi
• Trespass To Land
• Certificate Of Title
• Corporate Capacity
• Possession
• Cause Of Action

Don Dino Institute for Orphan Care Limited v Rev Fr. Casto and Others

Don Dino Institute for Orphan Care Limited v Rev Fr. Casto and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 5 of 2020) [2023] UGHCCD 88 (31 March 2023)

Court

HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application No. 5 of 2020

Judge

Serunkuma, J

The court found that a lawful order maintaining the status quo on the suit property was issued and that the 1st to 6th respondents, as agents or employees of the 6th respondent, had knowledge of the order through their counsel. Despite this, they altered the status quo by changing bank signatories and withdrawing funds to construct a new building, which constituted contempt regardless of their intentions or the purported benefit to the school. The court rejected the preliminary objections regarding lack of capacity and prematurity, holding that principal officers could act for the company and…

Source excerpt

• Contempt Of Court
• Interim Injunctions
• Status Quo Orders
• Corporate Capacity
• Agency Relationships

American Procurement Company Limited v Attorney General and Inspectorate of Government

American Procurement Company Limited v Attorney General and Inspectorate of Government (Civil Appeal No. 35 of 2009) [2014] UGCA 133 (4 April 2014)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 35 of 2009

Judge

Nshimye, JA, Buteera, JA, Kakuru, JA

The Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge arising from a government procurement contract, holding that ongoing IGG investigations made the suit premature and non-justiciable.

• Government Contracts
• Corporate Capacity
• Joinder Of Parties
• Judicial Review
• Fraud In Contracts
• Government-contracts

Peoples Transport Company Limited (In recievership) v Afric Co-operatives SOC limited

Peoples Transport Company Limited (In recievership) v Afric Co-operatives SOC limited (Civil Appeal 41 of 1997) [1999] UGCA 32 (4 March 1999)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal 41 of 1997

Judge

Okello, JA, Mpagi-Bahigeine, JA, Engwau, JA

The Court of Appeal held that a company under statutory receivership for divestiture lacked capacity to sue in its own name. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

• Receivership
• Corporate Capacity
• Public Enterprise Divestiture
• Statutory Interpretation
• Corporate-capacity
• Statutory-interpretation

Bank of Uganda v Banco Arabe Espanol

Bank of Uganda v Banco Arabe Espanol (Civil Appeal 8 of 1998) [1997] UGSC 5 (31 December 1997)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal 8 of 1998

The Supreme Court held that the loan agreement was valid and enforceable against the Bank of Uganda as guarantor. The Bank's representative had a valid, sealed power of attorney, which satisfied the requirements for corporate execution. The Attorney General's legal opinion, expressly made a condition precedent in the agreement, validated the contract's legality and enforceability. The Bank's subsequent admissions of liability, including written communications acknowledging the debt, estopped it from denying its obligations. The alleged variations in repayment terms and extensions were either…

Source excerpt

• Loan Guarantees
• Contract Enforceability
• Corporate Capacity
• Frustration Of Contract
• Estoppel
• Variation Of Contract Terms