JurisAssist Uganda Case Law
Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Uganda case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGCA 207

Mugume Silver v Uganda

Mugume Silver v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 0080 of 2020) [2025] UGCA 207 (27 June 2025)

Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 0080 of 2020
Judge
Kazibwe, JA, Nakachwa, JA/JCC, Kakooza Sabiiti, JA/ JCC

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge failed to follow the mandatory procedure for plea taking in a murder case. The record did not show that the essential ingredients of the offence were explained to the appellant, nor that the facts were read to him by the prosecution. The language of the proceedings was not indicated, creating doubt as to whether the appellant understood the charge and the consequences of his plea. The omission to read the facts and explain the ingredients of the offence was a grave procedural error that affected the validity of the plea and occasioned a miscarria…

Source excerpt

  • Plea Bargain Procedure
  • Conviction On Guilty Plea
  • Miscarriage Of Justice
  • Remand Period Credit
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGCA 234

Engulu v Uganda

Engulu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 353 of 2019) [2024] UGCA 234 (30 August 2024)

Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal 353 of 2019
Judge
Egonda-Ntende, JA, Cheborion-Barishaki, JA, Asa Mugenyi, JA/ JCC

The Court of Appeal found that the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory procedure for recording a guilty plea under Rule 12 and Schedule 2 of the Judicature (Plea Bargain) Rules, 2016. Specifically, the trial judge did not individually inform the appellant of his six constitutional rights, nor did she ensure that he voluntarily and knowingly waived each right before entering the plea. The failure to follow these procedural safeguards constituted a breach of the rules and resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were quashed, and a retrial was…

Source excerpt

  • Plea Bargain Procedure
  • Aggravated Defilement
  • Conviction On Guilty Plea
  • Rights Of Accused
  • Sentence Legality
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGCA 224

Tayebwa v Uganda

Tayebwa v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 97 of 2017) [2024] UGCA 224 (23 August 2024)

Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal 97 of 2017
Judge
Buteera, DCJ, Gashirabake, JA, Kihika, JA /JCC

The Court of Appeal found that the trial Judge followed the correct procedure in recording the plea of guilty, as the indictment and facts were read and explained to the appellant in a language he understood, and he unequivocally admitted the offence. The plea bargain agreement was properly executed and endorsed. However, the trial Judge erred by failing to deduct the period spent on remand from the sentence, which is a mandatory requirement under Article 23(8) of the Constitution. The Court set aside the original sentence and re-sentenced the appellant to 14 years and 7 months' imprisonment,…

Source excerpt

  • Aggravated Defilement
  • Plea Bargain Procedure
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Conviction On Guilty Plea
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] UGHCCRD 103

Achile v Uganda

Achile v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 0012 of 2017) [2017] UGHCCRD 103 (15 June 2017)

Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 0012 of 2017
Judge
Stephen Mubiru, J

The trial magistrate erred in law by refusing to allow the appellant to change his plea before sentencing, misapprehending the legal position that a conviction on a guilty plea does not bar a change of plea prior to sentence. The court failed to exercise its discretion judiciously and did not properly consider the reasons advanced by the appellant for changing his plea. Although the procedure for recording the plea was flawed, it did not occasion a miscarriage of justice regarding the equivocality of the plea. However, the denial of the opportunity to change plea before sentence constituted a…

Source excerpt

  • Libel
  • Plea Procedure
  • Change Of Plea
  • Conviction On Guilty Plea
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.