Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Ainebyona Tindikahwa v Tulinawe (CIVIL APPEAL NO.34 OF 2021) [2025] UGHC 235 (3 February 2025)
The High Court dismissed a civil appeal over alleged conversion of a power saw, but held the respondent should not have participated after failing to file a defence in time.
Byarugaba v Tumuhimbise & Another (Civil Suit 21 of 2020) [2024] UGHC 829 (27 June 2024)
The High Court found trespass beyond the permitted portion of land, declared the 2018 agreement void, awarded damages, and dismissed the counterclaim.
Uganda Rural Development and Training (URDT) and Another v Kimarakwija (Civil Appeal 15 of 2023) [2023] UGHC 150 (30 October 2023)
High Court civil appeal over detained goats and crop-damage counterclaims. The court upheld compensation and general damages, but set aside special damages for lack of pleading and proof.
Arrow Link (u) Limited v Hon. Ikojo and another (Civil Suit 16 of 2018) [2023] UGHCCD 203 (29 June 2023)
The High Court found the defendants trespassed on the plaintiff’s quarry sites, dismissed the unprosecuted counterclaim, and awarded damages, injunction, and return of equipment.
Mpandi v Prism Trading and Construction Co. Ltd (Civil Suit No. 230 of 2013) [2015] UGCommC 86 (19 June 2015)
The High Court held that the hire contract had expired, dismissed the claim for hire charges as time-barred, but awarded compensation for the vehicle’s loss, general damages, interest, and costs.
Mukisa Foods Limited v National Enterprises Corporation (Civil Suit 746 of 1992) [1996] UGHCLD 6 (29 May 1996)
The High Court held that the defendant unlawfully occupied repossessed commercial property and wrongfully removed machinery, awarding return/value, damages, and costs.
Karimjee Jivanjee and Co. v McDiarmid (C.A. 9/1936.) [1936] EACA 94 (1 January 1936)
The Court of Appeal held that Tanganyika law allowed a landlord to distrain through an agent, that no certified bailiff rule applied, and that the claim was not time-barred.
