Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Natukunda v Friday (Civil Appeal 5 of 2023) [2024] UGHC 848 (29 August 2024)
The High Court partly allowed a civil appeal over cohabitation property, finding the respondent proved only a 30% share and ordering each party to bear own costs.
Musoke v Nakku (Civil Appeal 15 of 2019) [2023] UGHC 364 (9 May 2023)
The High Court upheld a 70/30 division of matrimonial property in Masaka, finding that both spouses contributed directly and indirectly to the Kirumba B property.
Bugembe v Namutebi (Civil Appeal No. 35 of 2020) [2023] UGHCLD 83 (31 March 2023)
The appellate court found that the respondent made both monetary and non-monetary contributions to the development of the suit property. The evidence, including the sale of her inherited Kibanja land and her domestic work, was consistent and credible. The law recognizes such contributions, even in the absence of formal marriage, as conferring proprietary interests. The course of dealing between the parties demonstrated joint ownership as tenants in common. The trial magistrate's decision to award equal shares was supported by both the facts and applicable legal principles. The appeal was dism…
Source excerpt
Sekindi v Kaumba (Civil Suit 267 of 2017) [2023] UGHCFD 79 (27 March 2023)
The High Court held that the Muyenga property was jointly owned and should be shared equally, while the Luwero land remained the plaintiff’s inheritance but its developments were shared.
Batesaki v Saida aka Asiimwe Margret (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 141 OF 2016) [2020] UGHCCD 178 (11 June 2020)
The High Court allowed an appeal over a disputed house, held it was matrimonial property, set aside the trial decision, and ordered eviction and damages.
Katuramu v Katuramu (Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2017) [2018] UGHC 36 (10 September 2018)
The High Court refused to review a consent judgment declaring Katumba land family land, finding no mistake of fact, no abuse of process, and dismissing the application with costs.
Katuramu v Katuramu (Hct – 01 – Cv – Ma No. 026 of 2017) [2018] UGHCLD 55 (10 September 2018)
The High Court refused to review a consent judgment declaring land family land, finding no mistake of fact or sufficient cause and dismissing the application with costs.
