Roko Construction Limited v Ten Logistics Limited and Another (Miscellaneous Application 1020 of 2023) [2023] UGCommC 115 (13 November 2023)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 1020 of 2023
Judge
Kahigi Asiimwe, J
The High Court granted the applicant leave to defend a summary suit, finding a triable issue on whether any enforceable contract existed with the respondents.
Volcom Technical Services Limited and Another v Maniya (Miscellaneous Application 1944 of 2023) [2023] UGCommC 117 (6 November 2023)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
Miscellaneous Application 1944 of 2023
Judge
Kahigi Asiimwe, J
The court found that the Applicant raised a bona fide triable issue regarding the existence and enforceability of a contract between the Applicant and the Respondents. The evidence indicated that the contract for clearing the goods was between the Applicant and Welgrow Line (U) Ltd, and the debt settlement agreement referenced Welgrow Line (U) Ltd and the Respondents, not the Applicant. The Respondents relied on a letter of appointment as evidence of a contract, but the court determined that the letter did not fulfill all the requirements of a valid contract, such as clear terms of payment an…
Byte Legion Technologies v MTN (U) Ltd (HCT-00-CC-CS 95 of 2009) [2013] UGCommC 4 (21 January 2013)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
HCT-00-CC-CS 95 of 2009
The court found that the plaintiff company had a cause of action because a company can acquire intellectual property from its directors or shareholders, and the defendant had dealt with both the company and its Managing Director. However, the court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the information shared was confidential or sufficiently developed to warrant protection. The proposal lacked technical details such as source code, and there was no evidence that the defendant used confidential information or that the Google SMS Trader product was derived from the plaintiff’s idea. The c…
Kanyara v Hassan Ali Amhed [1991] UGSC 6 (27 February 1991)
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
On dissent, the Supreme Court of Uganda said a town council was not obliged to protect a former licensee’s claim for compensation from a new licensee.