Atwine v Uganda Railways Corporation and Another (Misc Cause 264 of 2022)
Atwine v Uganda Railways Corporation and Another (Misc Cause 264 of 2022) [2024] UGHCCD 104 (18 June 2024)
The court found that the Respondents, as public bodies, were subject to judicial review, but the applicant failed to establish any grounds for intervention. The Board was legally constituted at the time of the decision, and the Presidential directive did not invalidate its authority. The applicant did not meet the contractual conditions for renewal, particularly the requirement for performance appraisals, and failed to escalate appraisal disputes in a timely manner. There was no procedural impropriety, as the contract and HR Manual did not require a hearing or reasons for non-renewal. The dec…
Source excerpt
- Judicial Review
- Public Body Employment
- Contract Renewal
- Natural Justice
- Procedural Impropriety