Uganda Case Law

Kisu AATA v Uganda Telecom Limited (Labour Dispute Claim No. 275 of 2014)

Kisu AATA v Uganda Telecom Limited (Labour Dispute Claim No. 275 of 2014) [2021] UGIC 82 (17 December 2021)

Court

Industrial Court of Uganda

Case number

Labour Dispute Claim No. 275 of 2014

Judge

Rwomushana, Panel Member, Tumusiime-Mugisha, J, Ebyau, Panel Member, Mugambwa, Panel Member

The court found that Uganda Telecom Limited is in administration, as evidenced by an order of the High Court extending the administration period. The claimant's claim was not resolved or quantified prior to the administration deed, and therefore, he does not qualify as a creditor with a provable claim under the Insolvency Act. Section 164(2)(b) bars the continuance of legal proceedings against a company in administration unless leave of court is obtained. The claimant's claim, being unquantified and unresolved, does not fall within the category of contingent claims that are provable under the…

Source excerpt

• Insolvency Administration
• Contingent Creditor Status
• Stay Of Proceedings
• Administration Deed Effects