Attorney General v Senkali and Others
Attorney General v Senkali and Others (Civil Appeal 2 of 2008) [2009] UGSC 38 (21 January 2009)
The Supreme Court held that the successive revolutions and legal notices, particularly Legal Notice No. 1 of 1986, terminated the services of the respondents in the Uganda Army. The Court found that members of the armed forces are not public servants and thus not protected by the saving provisions applicable to civil servants. The evidence did not establish that the respondents remained members of the Uganda People's Defence Forces (UPDF) or were ever redeployed or recognized as such by the current government. The Court further held that the respondents' claims were time-barred under the appl…
Source excerpt
- Limitation Of Actions
- Termination Of Employment
- Military Service Rights
- Successor Liability
- Public Service Definition
- Constitutional Effect Of Revolution