Asiimwe Vs Attorney General
Asiimwe Vs Attorney General (Civil Appeal No. 050 of 2009) [2019] UGCA 132 (28 May 2019)
The Court found that the Constitutional Amendment Act, 2005, which amended Article 188, did not invalidate the appellant's substantive appointment as Chief Administrative Officer, nor did it require him to undergo a fresh interview or reappointment by the Public Service Commission. The advice of the Attorney General and the actions of the Public Service Commission were not based on law and had no legal effect on the appellant's appointment. The process leading to the appellant's retirement was unconstitutional and unlawful. The appellant's appointment remained valid, and he was entitled to re…
Source excerpt
- Judicial Review
- Public Service Appointments
- Constitutional Amendment Effects
- Unlawful Retirement
- Remedies Certiorari Prohibition