Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Kokop v Kapere & 2 Others (Civil Appeal 31 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 1075 (25 November 2024)
High Court appeal over stay of execution partially succeeded, with the stay maintained but subject to security for costs of UGX 20 million.
Ochieng v Kassim & 2 Others (Civil Suit 53 of 2021) [2024] UGHC 895 (30 September 2024)
The High Court of Uganda at Mbale rejected a partial consent between the plaintiff and two defendants, finding it ambiguous and potentially prejudicial, and ordered the suit to proceed.
Zirobwe Agali Awamu Agribusiness Training Association v Uganda Central Cooperative Financial Services & Another (Miscellaneous Application 532 of 2023) [2024] UGCommC 288 (12 July 2024)
The court found that the deponent, as secretary and principal officer of the applicant association, was competent to swear the affidavit in support of the application, regardless of the absence of proof of membership. The objection regarding lack of a board resolution was overruled, as current Ugandan law does not require a resolution to commence suit. The court determined that service of summons was effective, as the manager authorized receipt and the association's stamp was affixed to the plaint. On the merits, the applicant demonstrated good cause to set aside the default judgment and cons…
Source excerpt
Ssenkaali George v Standard Chartered Bank (U) Limited & Anor (HC Civil Suit 387 of 2020) [2024] UGHCLD 44 (21 February 2024)
The court found that the only remaining claim against the Commissioner Land Registration was for an order to register the plaintiff as proprietor of the suit property. This claim had already been litigated and finally determined in Misc. Cause No. 106 of 2018, where the court declined to grant the order. The present suit, therefore, was barred by res judicata under section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court emphasized that the plaintiff's remedy, if any, lay in appealing or seeking review of the previous decision, not in instituting a fresh suit on the same matter. The consent settlement…
Source excerpt
Airtel Uganda v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application No. TAT 43 of 2020) [2020] UGTAT 26 (20 May 2020)
The Tax Appeals Tribunal held that Airtel Uganda was not required to pay interest on disputed VAT and income tax for the period the application was pending.
