Ahmos Investment Group of Companies & 4 Ors v Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd
Ahmos Investment Group of Companies & 4 Ors v Stanbic Bank (U) Ltd (Miscellaneous Application No. 684 of 2014) [2015] UGCommC 191 (13 November 2015)
The court found that the applicants failed to prove that the consent agreement was entered into under duress or coercion to the required standard. Documentary evidence showed that the applicants acknowledged receipt of the double payment and agreed to refund it in several communications. The court determined that service of summons was effective: personal service was effected on some applicants, and substituted service was properly ordered and executed for others. The alleged inconsistencies in service dates were minor and did not affect the merits. The applicants did not establish good cause…
Source excerpt
- Summary Judgment
- Service Of Process
- Setting Aside Decree
- Consent Agreement
- Duress And Coercion
- Triable Issues