Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Uganda v Arugai (Criminal Session 14 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 163 (9 April 2025)
The High Court acquitted the accused at prima facie stage, holding that the complainant was 16 and the proper charge was defilement, not rape.
Kayondo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 27 of 2019) [2024] UGCA 228 (30 August 2024)
The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge properly evaluated the evidence regarding consent, noting the victim's immediate report to police, her detailed and uncontested statement, and the corroborating testimony of police officers and medical evidence. The appellant's version of consensual sex was inconsistent with the circumstances, particularly the victim's escape and the evidence of force and abduction. The trial judge correctly applied the law on rape, finding that consent was obtained by force and intimidation. Regarding sentencing, the appellate court held that the trial judge con…
Source excerpt
Uganda v Edemacu (Criminal Session Case 56 of 2023) [2023] UGHC 313 (20 July 2023)
The High Court convicted the accused of rape, finding the victim’s evidence credible, supported by medical evidence, and proving lack of consent and identity beyond reasonable doubt.
Uganda v Niwagaba (Criminal Session 241 of 2019) [2022] UGHCCRD 15 (11 March 2022)
The court found that the prosecution proved all essential ingredients of rape beyond reasonable doubt. The victim's testimony was corroborated by medical evidence and circumstantial evidence, including the recovery of the accused's sandal at the scene and his arrest immediately after the incident. The identification of the accused was reliable due to prior familiarity, adequate lighting, and close proximity during the incident. The evidence established that the sexual act was performed without the victim's consent and by the accused, satisfying the legal requirements for conviction. The court…
Source excerpt
Uganda v Tibagwa (Criminal Case No. 0004 of 2011) [2013] UGHCCRD 41 (10 September 2013)
The High Court convicted Tibagwa Bala of rape, finding the complainant’s evidence and medical report proved intercourse without consent beyond reasonable doubt.
Uganda Vs. Maganda Fred (HCT 03-CR-SC -no -0328 of 2010) [2010] UGHC 137 (9 September 2010)
The High Court of Uganda convicted Maganda Fred of rape, finding penetration, absence of consent, and identity proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Uganda Vs. Candia Charles (Crim. Sess. Case No. 35 Of 2008) (Crim. Sess. Case No. 35 of 2008) [2008] UGHC 145 (16 October 2008)
The court found that the accused admitted to having sexual intercourse with the complainant in his charge and caution statement, which was corroborated by the complainant's testimony and other prosecution witnesses. The complainant's immediate reporting of the incident, her emotional distress, and the pursuit of the case were consistent with non-consent. The identification of the accused was established through voice recognition and corroborative witness statements. The prosecution proved all essential ingredients of the offence of rape beyond reasonable doubt, including sexual intercourse, l…
Source excerpt
Uganda Vs. Akute Stephen alias Ouma (Crim. Case No. 03 Of 2008) (Crim. Case No. 03 of 2008) [2008] UGHC 146 (9 September 2008)
The court found that the prosecution proved all essential ingredients of rape beyond reasonable doubt: the victim's detailed and credible testimony established that sexual intercourse occurred without her consent, corroborated by eyewitness evidence of assault and threats with a gun. The accused was properly identified and his intent was clear from his statements and actions. The absence of medical evidence did not undermine the prosecution's case, as the victim's account was found truthful and sufficient. The court concluded that the accused used brutal force and abused his authority as a so…
Source excerpt
Uganda v Mperuka David (HCT-05-CR-SC-0123 OF 2003) (HCT-05-CR-SC-0123 of 2003) [2005] UGHC 49 (14 September 2005)
The High Court convicted Mperuka David of rape, relying on medical and circumstantial evidence, and rejected his denial and alibi. He was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment.
Uganda v Bekunda Silver (HCT-05-CR-SC-0086 of 2002) [2004] UGHC 13 (31 March 2004)
The High Court of Uganda convicted Bekunda Silver of rape, finding the complainant credible, corroborated by witness and physical evidence, and sentenced him to eight years imprisonment.
