Kato Gerald Senyange v Attorney General (Complaint UHRC 99 of 2011)
Kato Gerald Senyange v Attorney General (Complaint UHRC 99 of 2011) [2023] UGHRC 7 (7 February 2023)
The Tribunal found that the shooting of the complainant by a Police officer was unintentional and did not amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. However, the respondent was held liable for violation of the complainant's right to security of person. The Tribunal considered the evidence of injury, the respondent's admission and regret, and the impact on the complainant's life. It awarded general damages to compensate for the violation and ordered interest at the court rate until payment in full.
Source excerpt
- Right To Security Of Person
- Compensation For Violation
- State Liability
- General Damages