Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] UGHCLD 346

Atwiine and Another v Asiimwe (High Court Civil Appeal 76 of 2020)

Atwiine and Another v Asiimwe (High Court Civil Appeal 76 of 2020) [2023] UGHCLD 346 (31 August 2023)

The High Court upheld a temporary injunction preserving disputed land developments pending trial, finding the respondent showed an interest in the land and a balance of convenience in her favour.

  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Balance Of Convenience
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Irreparable Damage
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Preservation Of Evidence
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] UGHC 55

Atwiine and Another v Asiimwe (HCT-05-CV-CA 76 of 2020)

Atwiine and Another v Asiimwe (HCT-05-CV-CA 76 of 2020) [2023] UGHC 55 (31 August 2023)

The High Court upheld a temporary injunction preserving disputed developments on land, finding the applicant had a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favored her.

  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Balance Of Convenience
  • Prima Facie Case
  • Irreparable Damage
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Preservation Of Evidence
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2019] UGCA 167

Mulyanti & Anor Vs Bateringaya & 4 Ors

Mulyanti & Anor Vs Bateringaya & 4 Ors (Civil Appeal No. 0016 of 2010) [2019] UGCA 167 (2 July 2019)

The Court of Appeal found that the appellants failed to prove that they or their predecessor were lawful or bonafide occupants of the suit land. The evidence established that the suit land was sold by the appellants' predecessor's father to a third party, who then sold it to the respondents' predecessor. The subsequent occupation of the land by Moses Mulyanti was by permission of the registered owner as a caretaker, amounting to a licence, not a legal interest. Under Section 29(4) of the Land Act, a licensee cannot be considered a lawful or bonafide occupant, nor can such status be inherited…

  • Lawful Occupancy
  • Bonafide Occupancy
  • Licence And Caretaker Status
  • Eviction And Vacant Possession
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Succession And Estates
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2018] UGHCLD 46

Battaka v Uganda Investment Authority & Anor

Battaka v Uganda Investment Authority & Anor (Civil Suit No: 38 of 2011) [2018] UGHCLD 46 (29 May 2018)

The High Court held that the plaintiff was a trespasser on the disputed land and dismissed her compensation claim with costs.

  • Trespass To Land
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Squatters Rights
  • Limitation Periods
  • Ownership Disputes
  • Trespass-to-land
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2012] UGHC 188

Barya v Capital Saw Mills Ltd

Barya v Capital Saw Mills Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 004 of 2011) [2012] UGHC 188 (21 September 2012)

The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upheld findings of res judicata, and ordered the appellants to vacate Plot 2/4 Garage Street, Kabale, with costs.

  • Res Judicata
  • Vacant Possession
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Res-judicata
  • Vacant-possession
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2002] UGCA 11

Eriazari Diisi v Mbarara Trading Stores

Eriazari Diisi v Mbarara Trading Stores (Civil Appeal 11 of 2000) [2002] UGCA 11 (11 October 2002)

The appellant's lease over the suit property was null and void, as the respondent's lease continued in existence by operation of section 1(2)(b) of the Expropriated Properties Act. The allocation of the suit land to the appellant by Mbarara Municipal Council was unlawful and disregarded the respondent's continuing interest and warnings. The appellant's entry and developments on the land were tainted by illegality and underhand dealings with municipal officers, rendering him a trespasser with no legal or equitable interest. Compensation for improvements is not automatic under the Expropriated…

  • Leasehold Title Dispute
  • Expropriated Properties Act
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Trespass
  • Municipal Allocation
  • Eviction
Read case analysis
Land And Property [1993] UGSC 45

Kisekka v Seventh Day Adventist Church Association of Uganda

Kisekka v Seventh Day Adventist Church Association of Uganda (Civil Appeal 8 of 1993) [1993] UGSC 45 (15 December 1993)

The Supreme Court of Uganda dismissed an appeal over land developments, holding the appellant had not lawfully acquired the customary tenancy under the Land Reform Decree.

  • Customary Tenure
  • Land Reform Decree
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Transfer Of Customary Tenancy
  • Customary-tenure
  • Land-reform-decree
Read case analysis
Land And Property [1993] UGSC 7

Twaibu Kigongo v Kabogere Coffee Factory, Haji Bruhan Mugerwa

Twaibu Kigongo v Kabogere Coffee Factory, Haji Bruhan Mugerwa [1993] UGSC 7 (17 March 1993)

The Supreme Court of Uganda dismissed a land appeal, holding that the appellant’s kibanja transfer was unlawful for lack of statutory notice and authority under the Land Reform Decree.

  • Customary Tenure
  • Public Land Acquisition
  • Compensation For Developments
  • Land Reform Decree Compliance
  • Customary-tenure
  • Public-land
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.