Uganda Case Law

Bugaga Maanyi Multipurpose Co-operative Society LTD v Uganda National Roads Authority

Bugaga Maanyi Multipurpose Co-operative Society LTD v Uganda National Roads Authority (Civil Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 693 (9 July 2024)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

Civil Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2024

Judge

Oyuko Anthony Ojok, J

The High Court at Mpigi dismissed an application to set aside a consent judgment, finding no proved fraud, misrepresentation, mistake, or translation defect.

• Consent Judgment Review
• Compulsory Land Acquisition
• Compensation Dispute
• Misrepresentation Claims
• Consent-judgment
• Civil-procedure

Kabagambe (suing through her attorneys kabagambe rose and katusabe diana) v Mbabazi and Another

Kabagambe (suing through her attorneys kabagambe rose and katusabe diana) v Mbabazi and Another (Miscellaneous Application 80 of 2022) [2022] UGHCCD 294 (31 October 2022)

Court

HC: Civil Division (Uganda)

Case number

Miscellaneous Application 80 of 2022

Judge

Wagona, J

The Applicant has presented grounds that warrant the grant of leave to appeal. The court found that, prima facie, there are grounds of appeal which merit serious judicial consideration, particularly regarding the ownership of the suit land and the compensation awarded. The Applicant was not a party to the original suit and was unable to present new and important evidence due to her absence abroad. The Respondents did not oppose the application, and the facts as presented by the Applicant were deemed admitted. The court emphasized that the Applicant's right to appeal should be protected and th…

Source excerpt

• Leave To Appeal
• Review Of Judgment
• Ownership Of Land
• Compensation Dispute

Ssezi Musoke v Attorney General (H.C.Misc. Application No. 1128 of 2004)

Ssezi Musoke v Attorney General (H.C.Misc. Application No. 1128 of 2004) [2005] UGHCFD 2 (27 April 2005)

Court

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Case number

H.C.Misc. Application No. 1128 of 2004

Judge

Maitum, J

The High Court found the suit was filed against the wrong party and declined to grant leave to defend or allow amendment of the plaint.

• Summary Procedure
• Leave To Defend
• Wrong Party Sued
• Amendment Of Plaint
• Compensation Dispute
• Summary-procedure