In Re: Rankconsult (U) Ltd (HCT-00-CC-MA 695 of 2005) [2005] UGCommC 61 (14 October 2005)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
HCT-00-CC-MA 695 of 2005
The High Court refused URA’s request to appoint an interim liquidator for Rankconsult (U) Ltd, finding no sufficient showing of asset risk or public interest.
G.M. Combined (U) Ltd and Others v A.K. Detergents Ltd and Others (Civil Application No. 9 of 1998) [1998] UGSC 36 (30 November 1998)
Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Application No. 9 of 1998
Judge
Kanyeihamba, JSC
The court found that the application for further security for costs was properly brought under Rule 100(3) of the Supreme Court Rules and that the respondent's receivership and admitted financial difficulties justified the order for further security. The court rejected the argument that only Section 404 of the Companies Act applied, noting that both the Supreme Court Rules and the Companies Act contemplate security for costs in circumstances where a company may be unable to pay. The court determined that the applicants had made a convincing case for further security, taking into account the c…