Masiko v Imaniraguha & 2 Ors
Masiko v Imaniraguha & 2 Ors (Miscellaneous Application No. 1481 of 2016) [2017] UGHCLD 46 (27 April 2017)
The court found that a lawful court order for attachment and sale of the suit property existed and was known to the Respondents, particularly the 2nd Respondent. The Respondents failed to comply with the order, instead taking deliberate steps to frustrate execution by transferring the property and denying access through armed security. Procedural objections raised by the Respondents did not absolve them of the obligation to comply with the order, as only the issuing court could set aside or stay its own order. The Respondents' conduct amounted to contempt of court. The Applicant, having been…
Source excerpt
- Contempt Of Court
- Judicial Sale
- Attachment And Sale Of Property
- Vacant Possession
- Remedies For Contempt
- Commercial Transaction Disputes