Twentsche Overseas Trading Company, Limited v Uganda Sugar Factory, Limited, Uganda Sugar Factory, Limited, v Twentsche Overseas Trading Company (Privy Council Appeal No. 26 of 1943)
Twentsche Overseas Trading Company, Limited v Uganda Sugar Factory, Limited, Uganda Sugar Factory, Limited, v Twentsche Overseas Trading Company (Privy Council Appeal No. 26 of 1943) [1945] EACA 1 (1 January 1945)
The Privy Council held that a rail-supply contract was not frustrated by wartime disruption because the written terms did not require German supply.
- Contract Interpretation
- Frustration Of Contract
- Collateral Agreements
- Sale Of Goods
- Parol Evidence Rule
- Frustration-of-contract