Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 1 court collection
Last checked: 18 Sep 2026, 03:45 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

20 May 2022

Election Petitions [2022] UGCA 153

Wasige Wamudanya V Adidwa and Another

Wasige Wamudanya V Adidwa and Another (Election Petition Appeal No. 5 of 2021) [2022] UGCA 153 (20 May 2022)

Court: Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number: Election Petition Appeal No. 5 of 2021
Judge: Kiryabwire, JA, Musota, JA, Gashirabake, JA

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge exercised his discretion judiciously in refusing the amendment to the petition. The court found that the strict timelines and procedural requirements governing election petitions under the Parliamentary Elections Act and the relevant rules are intended to ensure diligence and avoid delays. Allowing the amendment would have resulted in a new petition outside the statutory time limit, fundamentally altering the cause of action and prejudicing the respondents. The court agreed that the Civil Procedure Rules may be applied to fill gaps in electoral pr…

Source excerpt

Amendment Of Petition
Timeliness Of Filing
Cause Of Action In Election Petitions
Application Of Civil Procedure Rules
Discretion In Election Petitions

Read case analysis

28 Apr 2022

Election Petitions [2022] UGCA 144

Nandagire Ndiwalana v Katushabe

Nandagire Ndiwalana v Katushabe (Election Appeal No. 34 of 2021) [2022] UGCA 144 (28 April 2022)

Court: Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number: Election Appeal No. 34 of 2021
Judge: Kiryabwire, JA, Musota, JA, Gashirabake, JA

The Court of Appeal held that the respondent was estopped from raising nomination-related complaints after the election, as such matters should have been addressed through the statutory process before the election date. The court found that the petition did not disclose a cause of action, since it was entirely based on nomination issues that were not timely raised. The appellate court emphasized that election petitions must relate to the conduct of the election itself, and that the statutory framework is designed to resolve pre-election disputes with finality before voting occurs. Consequentl…