Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2017] UGHCLD 260

Remo v Midia Sub-County Local Government

Remo v Midia Sub-County Local Government (Civil Appeal No. 0008 of 2014) [2017] UGHCLD 260 (20 July 2017)

The High Court allowed an appeal against dismissal of a land suit and injunction application, holding that statutory notice was not a mandatory bar and the matter should be heard on merits.

  • Statutory Notice Requirements
  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Binding Precedent
  • Customary Land Ownership
  • Statutory-notice
  • Temporary-injunctions
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] UGHC 8

Continental Tobacco (U) Limited v Global Hardware Company Limited

Continental Tobacco (U) Limited v Global Hardware Company Limited (Civil Appeal No. 0017 of 2013) [2016] UGHC 8 (1 December 2016)

The High Court found that the appellant's failure to attend court was solely attributable to the negligence of its advocate, who failed to communicate the hearing date. The appellant was not complicit in this negligence. The lower court erred by disregarding binding precedent that holds a client should not be penalized for the mistake of counsel. The burden was on the respondent to prove that the appellant was notified of the hearing date, which was not discharged. The Chief Magistrate's refusal to follow binding authorities and reliance solely on the procedural rule regarding service on advo…

  • Ex Parte Judgment
  • Setting Aside Judgment
  • Mistake Of Counsel
  • Binding Precedent
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] UGHCCD 116

Continental Tobacco (U) Limited v Global Hardware Company Limited

Continental Tobacco (U) Limited v Global Hardware Company Limited (CIVIL APPEAL No. 0017 OF 2013) [2016] UGHCCD 116 (1 December 2016)

The Chief Magistrate erred by failing to follow binding precedent regarding the effect of counsel's negligence on the client. The appellant was not complicit in the advocate's failure to communicate the hearing date, and the burden of proof to show notification lay with the respondent, which was not discharged. The lower court improperly dismissed the application to set aside the ex-parte judgment, disregarding established legal principles that protect litigants from the consequences of their counsel's mistakes. The appeal succeeds, the ex-parte judgment and decree are set aside, and the suit…

  • Ex Parte Judgment
  • Setting Aside Judgment
  • Mistake Of Counsel
  • Binding Precedent
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.