JurisAssist Uganda Case Law
Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter Uganda case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2022] UGPPDPAAT 16

MBJ Technologies Limited v Mbarara City and 2 Others (Application No. 17 of 2022)

MBJ Technologies Limited v Mbarara City and 2 Others (Application No. 17 of 2022) [2022] UGPPDPAAT 16 (8 July 2022)

Court
Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Appeals Tribunal
Case number
Application No. 17 of 2022
Judges
Gimara SC, Chairperson, Kakira, Panel Member, Kyarisiima, Kalumba, Asiimwe

The Tribunal found that the applicant's administrative review application was filed outside the statutory time limits prescribed by the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act, 2003 as amended. The Accounting Officer's decision was communicated out of time, rendering it null and void. The applicant, as a bidder, was required to file the application within ten calendar days from the expiry of the period for the Accounting Officer's decision, but failed to do so. The Tribunal emphasized that statutory time limits are mandatory and strictly binding, and it has no jurisdiction to ent…

Source excerpt

  • Public Procurement Review
  • Jurisdiction Of Tribunal
  • Statutory Time Limits
  • Bidder Rights
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2021] UGPPDPAAT 8

Preg-Tech Communications Limited v Uganda Police Force (Application No. 32 of 2021)

Preg-Tech Communications Limited v Uganda Police Force (Application No. 32 of 2021) [2021] UGPPDPAAT 8 (21 December 2021)

Court
Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Appeals Tribunal
Case number
Application No. 32 of 2021
Judges
Nerima, Panel Member, Isanga, Ag. Chairperson, Kakira, Kalumba

The Tribunal found that the purported cancellation of the procurement by the Respondent was invalid as there was no evidence of approval by the Contracts Committee, as required by law. The Tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to hear the application. The Accounting Officer failed to make and communicate a decision on the Applicant's complaint within the statutory period, rendering the subsequent decision a nullity. The Applicant was not entitled to updates on the procurement progress or a debrief prior to contract signing, and the complaint regarding the competitor's manufacturer's authorisati…

Source excerpt

  • Public Procurement Review
  • Procurement Cancellation
  • Administrative Decision Timing
  • Bidder Rights
  • Evaluation Committee Procedure
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2010] UGSC 34

Chogm Tour Agents 2007 (U) Ltd v Masaka Municipal Council Local Government

Chogm Tour Agents 2007 (U) Ltd v Masaka Municipal Council Local Government (Civil Appeal 7 of 2010) [2010] UGSC 34 (25 January 2010)

Court
Supreme Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Appeal 7 of 2010
Judge
Odoki, CJ, J.W.N.Tsekooko, JSC, G. M. Okello, JSC, Tumwesigye, JSC, Kisaakye, JSC

The Supreme Court held that the respondent and PPDA did not contravene the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act or its Regulations in handling the complaint from Equator Touring Services Ltd, as the complaint was first submitted in writing to the Town Clerk, the accounting officer, and only escalated to PPDA after the Town Clerk failed to resolve the issue. The meeting of 22-09-2008 was properly convened by the Executive Director of PPDA, who is empowered to manage day-to-day operations, and the recommendations made were within the legal mandate. The extension of Equator Touri…

Source excerpt

  • Public Procurement
  • Judicial Review
  • Local Government Contracts
  • Bidder Rights
  • Contract Extension
  • Administrative Review
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.