Kafophan and SIAAP Consortium v Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries and Another (Application No. 31 of 2022)
Kafophan and SIAAP Consortium v Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries and Another (Application No. 31 of 2022) [2022] UGPPDPAAT 30 (11 October 2022)
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to discharge the evidential burden required to demonstrate a reasonable and substantiated belief that the Accounting Officer would not impartially handle its complaint. The particulars cited by the applicant were ordinary processes in procurement evaluation and did not amount to proof of partiality. Furthermore, the application was filed three days out of time, beyond the statutory ten-day limit prescribed by the PPDA Act. The Tribunal held that strict compliance with statutory time limits is mandatory and that failure to comply extinguishes its ju…
Source excerpt
- Public Procurement Review
- Bid Evaluation Process
- Locus Standi
- Time Limit For Review
- Conflict Of Interest
- Administrative Justice