Rukundo v Uganda
Rukundo v Uganda (Criminal Revision No. 21 of 2015) [2016] UGHCCRD 93 (5 January 2016)
The court held that the existence of a valid and subsisting order from the Anti-Corruption Division of the High Court, which specifically restrained the operation of the applicant's bank account, rendered the present application for revision moot. The Magistrate's order freezing the account had already served its purpose, and the subsequent High Court order, which was valid for six months or until further orders, superseded any relief that could be granted in the present application. The court emphasized that court orders must be obeyed unless set aside or varied, and that the proper procedur…
Source excerpt
- Freezing Orders
- Bank Accounts
- Court Orders Compliance
- Criminal Revision