Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2019] UGCA 2046

Bagala v Uganda Revenue Authourity (Court of Appeal No. 35 of 2010)

Bagala v Uganda Revenue Authourity (Court of Appeal No. 35 of 2010) [2019] UGCA 2046 (16 December 2019)

The Court of Appeal held Uganda Revenue Authority liable for mobile phones lost while in its custody, allowed the appeal, and awarded damages, interest, and costs.

  • Bailment Liability
  • Duty Of Care
  • Negligence In Custody
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Special And General Damages
  • Bailment-liability
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2008] UGCA 28

SDV Transami (U) Ltd v Nsibambi Enterprises

SDV Transami (U) Ltd v Nsibambi Enterprises (Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2006) [2008] UGCA 28 (1 January 2008)

The Court of Appeal upheld liability for damaged cargo, holding that the exemption clause did not excuse a fundamental breach. It also allowed the cross-appeal on costs.

  • Contract Of Carriage
  • Exemption Clauses
  • Negligence Of Carrier
  • Bailment Liability
  • Award Of Costs
  • Contract-of-carriage
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1997] UGHC 12

Mukasa Vincent v Nile Safari Limited

Mukasa Vincent v Nile Safari Limited (Civil Suit 870 of 1995) [1997] UGHC 12 (10 April 1997)

The High Court held that a vehicle hire contract was frustrated after the hired vehicle was stolen, dismissing the plaintiff’s claim for return or value of the car.

  • Contract Frustration
  • Hire Agreement
  • Conversion And Detinue
  • Bailment Liability
  • Contract-frustration
  • Hire-agreement
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1941] EACA 3

Boazman and Another v Hon. Attorney General of Uganda

Boazman and Another v Hon. Attorney General of Uganda (Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1941) [1941] EACA 3 (1 January 1941)

The Court of Appeal held that under the Indian Contract Act, sections 151 and 152, a bailee's standard of care may be contractually modified, including reduction below the statutory norm, by special contract. The exclusion clause in the present case was clear and unambiguous, expressly exempting the carrier from liability for loss, including that caused by its own or its servants' negligence. The Court further held that such exclusion clauses are not void as contrary to public policy, as established by both Indian and English authorities. The appellants, having agreed to the exclusion clause…

  • Carriage Of Goods
  • Contractual Exclusion Clauses
  • Bailment Liability
  • Public Policy In Contracts
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.