Uganda Case Law

Ssenyonga v Uganda

Ssenyonga v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 82 of 2020) [2025] UGSC 18 (17 April 2025)

Court

Supreme Court of Uganda

Case number

Criminal Appeal 82 of 2020

Judge

Tibatemwa-Ekirikubinza, JSC, Tuhaise, JSC, Mike Chibita, JSC, Stephen Musota, JSC, Madrama , JSC

The Supreme Court found that the appeal was essentially a challenge to the severity of sentence, which is prohibited under Section 5(3) of the Judicature Act. The Court of Appeal had properly considered both the mitigating and aggravating factors, including the appellant's time spent on remand, age, and status as a first-time offender. The reduction of the sentence from 45 years to 43 years and 5 months reflected the deduction for time spent on remand, in compliance with Article 23(8) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court concluded that there was no error of law or failure to consider releva…

Source excerpt

• Sentencing Principles
• Mitigating Factors
• Aggravating Factors
• Remand Period Deduction
• Jurisdiction On Sentence
• Appeal On Point Of Law

Singh v Singh

Singh v Singh (Civil Appeal No. 836 of 1951) [1952] EACA 313 (1 January 1952)

Court

East African Court of Appeal

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 836 of 1951

Judge

Bourke J

An appellant who denied being a tenant before the Rent Control Board was estopped from later challenging the notice to quit on appeal. Appeal dismissed.

• Landlord Tenant Disputes
• Rent Arrears
• Eviction Proceedings
• Notice To Quit
• Estoppel
• Appeal On Point Of Law