Twine Naboth v Uganda
Twine Naboth v Uganda (Criminal Appeal. No. 01/2011) [2011] UGHC 156 (31 October 2011)
The trial magistrate erred in law by shifting the burden of proof to the accused, contrary to fundamental principles of criminal law. The prosecution failed to prove the offences of embezzlement and abuse of office beyond reasonable doubt. The unresolved question of who received the money paid to a ghost teacher created reasonable doubt, and the trial magistrate did not properly evaluate the evidence in its totality. The conviction and sentence were therefore unlawful, and the appeal was allowed, with the conviction quashed and sentence set aside.
Source excerpt
- Burden Of Proof
- Embezzlement
- Abuse Of Office
- Reasonable Doubt
- Criminal Conviction
- Appeal Disposition