Figgis v Rex
Figgis v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 1940) [1940] EACA 39 (1 January 1940)
The appeal succeeded because the proof that the appellant uttered the alleged words was not precise or sufficiently corroborated, and the conviction was against the weight of the evidence.
- Defence Censorship Regulations
- Uttering False Information
- Alarm And Despondency
- Weight Of Evidence
- Corroboration
- Appellate Review Of Facts