Aitel Uganda Limited v Waste Masters Limited (Civil Appeal 23 of 2022) [2023] UGHCCD 400 (19 September 2023)
Court
HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
Case number
Civil Appeal 23 of 2022
Judge
Baguma, J
The High Court dismissed Airtel Uganda Limited’s appeal, upholding the trial court’s award for waste disposal services after finding the contract partly oral and partly written.
Hardware Deals (U) Ltd v Alam Construction EA Ltd (HCT-00-CC-CS 658 of 2003) [2005] UGCommC 25 (30 May 2005)
Court
Commercial Court of Uganda
Case number
HCT-00-CC-CS 658 of 2003
The High Court Commercial Court dismissed a claim for payment for goods supplied, finding no proof that the alleged agent had ongoing authority to bind the defendant.
Valabhdas v Andrew and Another (Civil Appeal No. 86 of 1955) [1950] EACA 232 (1 January 1950)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Civil Appeal No. 86 of 1955
Judge
Bacon, JA, Briggs (Acting Vice-President), Worley, P
The court held that “buy back” included a mercantile covering purchase, and that the agents acted within authority when they allocated bought cloves to open contracts.
Nanji v Ex Parte the Creditors D.R. Gandhi and Co (Bankruptcy Cause No. I of 1938) [1938] EACA 176 (1 January 1938)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Bankruptcy Cause No. I of 1938
Judge
Hayden J
The court found that the debtor's manager, acting under explicit instructions from the debtor, gave notice to the creditors of the suspension of payment, thereby committing an act of bankruptcy on behalf of the debtor. The court distinguished prior case law that required personal acts where not authorized, holding that agency is sufficient where the agent acts with the debtor's authority. Furthermore, substituted service of the petition on the debtor's agent was deemed valid, as the debtor received actual notice and had ample time to respond. The court relied on statutory provisions and relev…