Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGHC 163

Uganda v Arugai

Uganda v Arugai (Criminal Session 14 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 163 (9 April 2025)

The High Court acquitted the accused at prima facie stage, holding that the complainant was 16 and the proper charge was defilement, not rape.

  • Rape
  • Defilement
  • Consent In Sexual Offences
  • Age Of Victim
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Prosecutorial Errors
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2005] UGHC 20

Uganda v Akandinda Jackson (HCT-05-CR-SC-0038 of 2004) (HCT-05-CR-SC-0038 of 2004)

Uganda v Akandinda Jackson (HCT-05-CR-SC-0038 of 2004) (HCT-05-CR-SC-0038 of 2004) [2005] UGHC 20 (14 September 2005)

The High Court of Uganda convicted Akandinda Jackson of defilement after finding the complainant was under 18, had intercourse, and the accused participated.

  • Defilement
  • Sexual Offences
  • Age Of Victim
  • Medical Evidence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Sexual-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2005] UGHC 18

Uganda v Arinaitwe Denis (HCT-05-CR-SC-0141 of 2003) (HCT-05-CR-SC-0141 of 2003)

Uganda v Arinaitwe Denis (HCT-05-CR-SC-0141 of 2003) (HCT-05-CR-SC-0141 of 2003) [2005] UGHC 18 (12 September 2005)

The High Court of Uganda convicted Arinaitwe Denis of defilement, finding the complainant was under 18 and the sexual intercourse was unlawful.

  • Defilement
  • Age Of Victim
  • Unlawful Sexual Intercourse
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Criminal-law
  • Age-of-victim
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1994] UGHCCRD 17

Uganda v Tenywa

Uganda v Tenywa (Criminal Session Case No. 74/1994) [1994] UGHCCRD 17 (21 December 1994)

The High Court acquitted Abdala Tenywa of defilement after finding the prosecution had not proved the complainant was under 18 or established a safe conviction.

  • Defilement
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Age Of Victim
  • Corroboration
  • Standard Of Proof
  • Burden-of-proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1994] UGHCCRD 29

Pamba v Uganda

Pamba v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 1993) [1994] UGHCCRD 29 (15 February 1994)

The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was under the age of 18 years at the time of the alleged offence. The only evidence of age was the victim's own testimony, which was inconsistent and unsupported by documentary or medical evidence. The court noted that the prosecution should have called the father or a medical expert to give an opinion on the victim's age. Since proof of age is an essential element of the offence of defilement, and the prosecution failed to establish this element, the court held that a prima facie case had not been ma…

  • Defilement
  • Elements Of Offence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Age Of Victim
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.