Ndahura v Uganda
Ndahura v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 31 of 1991) [1993] UGSC 36 (5 May 1993)
The Supreme Court found that the conviction for murder was supported by the evidence, including eyewitness testimony, and that the appellant's alibi was false and properly rejected. However, the trial judge erred by determining the appellant's age based solely on observation without evidence, and the prosecution failed to prove the appellant was over 18 at the time of the offence. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the appellant's claim that he was under 18 should have been accepted. Consequently, the mandatory death sentence could not be imposed, and the appropriate order was detent…
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Age Of Criminal Responsibility
- Sentencing
- Alibi Defence