Ssebina & Others v Pearl Development Group Ltd & Others
Ssebina & Others v Pearl Development Group Ltd & Others (Miscellaneous Application 151 of 2023) [2024] UGHCLD 56 (4 March 2024)
The court found that the applicants had already amended their plaint once and failed to exercise their right to reply to the written statements of defence. The intended amendment was an afterthought, sought to defeat the respondents' defences of limitation and lack of cause of action, and was prejudicial. The amendment did not introduce any new matter in controversy that could not be handled by existing pleadings. The application was found to be mala fide, against the law of limitation, and intended to distort evidence. Therefore, the application did not meet the legal test for granting leave…
Source excerpt
- Amendment Of Pleadings
- Limitation Of Actions
- Cause Of Action
- Affidavit Practice