Uganda v Ojangole
Uganda v Ojangole (Criminal Case 1 of 2014) [2014] UGHCACD 3 (13 February 2014)
The court held that M/S Ligomarc & Co. Advocates, being the legal representatives of the accused’s employer and having compiled evidence central to the prosecution’s case, are in a position of conflict of interest if they represent the accused. The firm’s involvement as both potential witnesses and counsel creates a scenario where professional conduct regulations are breached, specifically those prohibiting advocates from acting where they may be required to give evidence or where their fiduciary duties are compromised. The accused’s constitutional right to counsel of choice does not override…
Source excerpt
- Conflict Of Interest
- Fiduciary Duty
- Professional Conduct Of Advocates
- Right To Counsel
- Advocate As Witness