Berger v Rex
Berger v Rex (Criminal Appeals Nos. 23 and 24 of 1941) [1940] EACA 54 (1 January 1940)
The court refused fresh evidence on appeal but varied two criminal sentences to run concurrently because the offences arose from the same transaction.
- Defence Regulations
- Sentencing Variation
- Admission Of Further Evidence
- Concurrent Sentences
- Criminal-appeal
- Fresh-evidence