Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2021] AfCHPR 58

Rutechura v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 004/2016)

Rutechura v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 004/2016) [2021] AfCHPR 58 (26 February 2021)

The African Court dismissed Evodius Rutechura’s fair-trial claims against Tanzania, finding no violation in review proceedings, legal aid, or evidence evaluation.

  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Legal Aid And Representation
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Admissibility Of Human Rights Applications
  • Evaluation Of Evidence
  • Death Penalty Provisional Measures
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2020] AfCHPR 30

Lyambaka v United Republic of Tanzania

Lyambaka v United Republic of Tanzania [2020] AfCHPR 30 (25 September 2020)

The African Court held it had jurisdiction over Hamad Mohamed Lyambaka’s application, but found it inadmissible because it was not filed within a reasonable time.

  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Reasonable Time Requirement
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Limitations
  • Legal Representation
  • Admissibility Of Human Rights Applications
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2019] AfCHPR 51

Bunyerere v Tanzania (Application No. 031/2015)

Bunyerere v Tanzania (Application No. 031/2015) [2019] AfCHPR 51 (28 November 2019)

The African Court found Tanzania did not violate Articles 2, 3 or 7 of the Charter in Dismas Bunyerere’s challenge to his armed robbery conviction and sentence.

  • Right To Non Discrimination
  • Equality Before The Law
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Admissibility Of Human Rights Applications
  • Fair-trial-rights
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.