Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Twed Property Development Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 13 of 2025) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 17 (30 June 2025)
The Tribunal set aside a procurement award to Speke Hotel (1996) Ltd, holding that mandatory post-qualification was omitted and the process had to be re-evaluated.
Mbarara City Truck Owners , Drivers and Loaders Cooperative Limited v Mbarara City Coucil (Application 9 of 2025) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 11 (28 March 2025)
The Tribunal found that the applicant's administrative review application was properly before it, as the Accounting Officer failed to respond within the statutory period and did not provide guidance on payment of review fees. The Tribunal held that the Evaluation Committee was not bound by the Accounting Officer's observations regarding bid compliance, but only by the corrective measure to re-evaluate the bids. Upon review, the Tribunal determined that both the applicant and the best-evaluated bidder failed to provide proof that they were formed by truck owners and drivers within the lorry pa…
Source excerpt
Emtec Technical Services Limited v Uganda High court Commission Dare -es-Salaam, Tanzania (Application 5 of 2025) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 8 (13 March 2025)
The Tribunal set aside a procurement disqualification, holding that the bidder’s foreign-contractor letter satisfied the bidding document and that clarification should have been sought.
SR Afrochicks and Breeders Limited v Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries (Application 7 of 2025) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 10 (4 March 2025)
The Tribunal found that the Respondent's Accounting Officer failed to make and communicate a decision within the statutory 10-day period, rendering the decision invalid. However, upon merits review, the Tribunal determined that the Applicant's bid was rightfully disqualified at the preliminary stage for failure to submit mandatory eligibility documents, including a valid NSSF clearance certificate, audited books of accounts for the specified years, and evidence of access to financial resources. These omissions constituted material deviations that could not be remedied post-submission. The Tri…
Source excerpt
National Information Technology Authority Uganda v Gulf Africa Limited (Civil Appeal 126 of 2024) [2025] UGHCCD 38 (26 February 2025)
The High Court found that the impugned procurement was governed by World Bank Standard Procurement Documents and the Procurement Management Manual, which provide a complaints management procedure distinct from that under the PPDA Act. The Manual, formed under the Financing Agreement with the International Development Association, constitutes an international obligation that prevails over the PPDA Act per Section 3(1). The Manual and bidding documents only permit complaints to be addressed to the Executive Director of the appellant, with review and clearance by the World Bank, and do not provi…
Source excerpt
Mbarara City Truck Owners , Drivers and Loaders Cooperative Limited v Mbarara City Council (Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2024) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 4 (24 January 2025)
The Tribunal dismissed a contempt application, finding the respondent had complied with orders to re-evaluate bids and that non-payment issues were not for contempt proceedings.
Gabikan Engineering Limited v Ministry of Works and Transport and Another (Application 50 of 2024) [2025] UGPPDPAAT 3 (15 January 2025)
The Tribunal found that the Applicant's bid validity expired on March 31, 2024, and there was no evidence of further extension. By the time the application was filed on December 24, 2024, the Applicant was no longer a bidder and thus lacked locus standi under section 115(1) of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act. Furthermore, the Applicant's administrative review complaint to the Accounting Officer was made on October 4, 2024, and the statutory period for filing an application with the Tribunal expired on October 24, 2024. The application was filed two months out of time.…
Source excerpt
ATHWAX Consultatants Limited v Mbarara City Council and Another (Miscellaneous Application 5 of 2024) [2024] UGPPDPAAT 47 (19 December 2024)
The Tribunal dismissed a contempt application, holding that its earlier order allowing the Respondent to continue procurement was discretionary, not mandatory.
Mbarara City Truck, Owners, Drivers and Loaders Cooperative Limited v Mbarara City Council (Application 43 of 2024) [2024] UGPPDPAAT 43 (4 November 2024)
The Tribunal set aside a procurement award and ordered re-evaluation, holding that the applicant’s bid security declaration was not fatally non-responsive.
Quality Inspection Services Inc. Japan v Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) and 2 Others (Civil Appeal 37 of 2024) [2024] UGHCCD 157 (4 October 2024)
The High Court allowed a procurement appeal, finding the tribunal erred in law by upholding awards made without a proper evaluation report and minutes.
