Mohamed v El-Amri and Another (C.A. 8/1934)
Mohamed v El-Amri and Another (C.A. 8/1934) [1935] EACA 15 (1 January 1935)
The court held that a receiving order under the Bankruptcy Ordinance requires facts justifying committal, and allowed appeal against both receiving and adjudication orders.
- Bankruptcy Proceedings
- Receiving Order
- Adjudication Order
- Execution Of Judgment
- Right Of Appeal
- Bankruptcy-proceedings