Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2021] UGCA 39

Namusoke v Uganda

Namusoke v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 2018) [2021] UGCA 39 (29 July 2021)

The Court of Appeal upheld Namusoke Annet Kirabo’s conviction for kidnap with intent to procure a ransom, finding the circumstantial evidence sufficient.

  • Kidnap With Intent To Procure Ransom
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Kidnap-with-intent-to-procure-ransom
  • Circumstantial-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2001] UGHC 96

Uganda v Nuwayinamani Yubu & 2 Ors

Uganda v Nuwayinamani Yubu & 2 Ors (Criminal Session CAse No. 254 of 1997) [2001] UGHC 96 (8 June 2001)

The High Court of Uganda convicted one accused of murdering Rwakanigane Festo, but acquitted the other two for lack of proof of participation.

  • Murder
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Confession Evidence
  • Common Intention
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Confession-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1950] EACA 440

Gathigi and Another v Reginam

Gathigi and Another v Reginam (Criminal Appeals Nos. 475 and 476 of 1955) [1950] EACA 440 (1 January 1950)

The convictions were unsafe because the trial judge relied on six items as corroboration of the accomplice's evidence, but only one of these—the presence of the deceased's red coat in the appellant's hut as testified by Eliud Kogi—could be considered corroboration in law. The other five items were either legally invalid as corroboration or did not independently implicate the appellants. The law requires that corroboration must be independent evidence connecting the accused to the crime, and one accomplice cannot corroborate another. The trial judge's reliance on invalid corroboration constitu…

  • Murder
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Corroboration
  • Accessory After The Fact
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1947] EACA 54

Rex v Duloo and Others

Rex v Duloo and Others (Criminal Appeals Nos. 217, 218 and 219 of 1947) [1947] EACA 54 (1 January 1947)

The East African Court of Appeal upheld murder convictions based on a “lion-man” killing, rejecting the claim that fearful witnesses were accomplices.

  • Murder
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Principal Offender
  • Evidence Assessment
  • Failure To Report
  • Threat And Fear
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1946] EACA 25

Rex v Lifa

Rex v Lifa (Criminal Appeal No. 307 of 1945) [1946] EACA 25 (1 January 1946)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa upheld a murder conviction, holding that the deceased’s wife was not an accomplice or accessory after the fact.

  • Murder
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Accessory After The Fact
  • Evidence Assessment
  • Accomplice-liability
  • Accessory-after-the-fact
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1946] EACA 48

Rex v Masabo and Another

Rex v Masabo and Another (Criminal Appeals Nos. 222 and 223 of 1946) [1946] EACA 48 (1 January 1946)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa quashed murder convictions against two appellants, holding the evidence did not prove common design or reliable participation.

  • Murder
  • Common Design
  • Evidence Assessment
  • Accomplice Liability
  • Criminal-law
  • Common-design
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.