Muhumuza and 2 others v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2021) [2022] UGHCCRD 54 (11 October 2022)
Court
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2021
Judge
Byaruhanga Rugyema, J
The High Court quashed convictions for malicious damage to property after finding the trial court failed to properly evaluate the appellants’ defences of accident, claim of right, and alibi.
The Supreme Court held that the trial court properly admitted the charge and caution statement as both the appellant and his counsel did not dispute its voluntariness, and the procedure followed was consistent with established precedent. The court found that the defences of provocation, self-defence, and accident were not available to the appellant, as the evidence showed he deliberately shot the deceased without any attack or wrongful act from her. The post-mortem and eyewitness testimony supported the prosecution's case. The sentence of life imprisonment was not manifestly excessive or wron…
The Supreme Court of Uganda upheld a murder conviction and life sentence, holding that the appellant’s confession was properly admitted and that provocation, self-defence, and accident were unavailable.
Obadia Kuku V Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1998) [1999] UGCA 5 (28 July 1999)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1998
The Court of Appeal of Uganda allowed a murder appeal, finding material contradictions in the prosecution evidence and accepting the appellant’s accident defence.
Kalimedo v Reginam (Criminal Appeal No. 79 of 1956) [1950] EACA 503 (1 January 1950)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 79 of 1956
Judge
Bacon, JA, Sinclair, VP, Worley, P
The East African Court of Appeal allowed a manslaughter appeal, quashing the conviction and sentence where accident evidence was not properly rejected.