Share
XYZ v Republic of Benin (Application No. 057/2019) [2024] AfCHPR 37 (6 February 2024)
- Citation
- [2024] AfCHPR 37
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud P, Adjei J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko VP, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 057/2019
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud P, Adjei J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko VP, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 057/2019
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court found that the Applicant had clearly expressed the intention to discontinue the proceedings by submitting a letter of discontinuance. In the absence of any objection or response from the Respondent State, and pursuant to Rule 65(1)(a) of the Rules, the Court determined that it was appropriate to grant the Applicant's request and strike out the application from its cause list. The Court further clarified that this procedural order does not preclude the Applicant from seeking re-listing of the application in the future, as provided under Rule 65(3) of the Rules.
Court disposition
Application struck out following withdrawal by the Applicant.
Orders
- The Applicant's request for withdrawal of the Application is granted.
- Application 057/2019 - XYZ v. Republic of Benin - is struck out from the cause list.
02
Material facts
Parties
XYZ
Applicant Counsel: Self-representedRepublic of Benin
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Iréné AcomblessiAmounts and remedies
- Fine Imposed on Lionel Zinsou: XOF 50,000,000
- Suspended Imprisonment (months): 6
- Period of Ineligibility to Run for Election (years): 5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Strike Out Application / Order on Withdrawal and Strike Out
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Applicant's withdrawal request should be granted and the application struck out from the cause list.
- 02
Whether the withdrawal affects the Applicant's right to re-list the application in the future.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Applicant submitted a letter of discontinuance, indicating the intention not to pursue the application further.
- Respondent
- The Respondent State did not file a response to the Applicant's letter of discontinuance.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 65(1)(a) of the Rules of Court
The Court may strike out an application where the applicant notifies the Court of their intention not to proceed with the case.
- 02
Rule 65(3) of the Rules of Court
Striking out an application does not affect the right of the applicant to apply for re-listing in accordance with the Rules.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court found that the Applicant had clearly expressed the intention to discontinue the proceedings by submitting a letter of discontinuance. In the absence of any objection or response from the Respondent State, and pursuant to Rule 65(1)(a) of the Rules, the Court determined that it was appropriate to grant the Applicant's request and strike out the application from its cause list. The Court further clarified that this procedural order does not preclude the Applicant from seeking re-listing of the application in the future, as provided under Rule 65(3) of the Rules.
Obiter and limits
- The striking out of the application does not affect the right of the Applicant to apply for the re-listing of the Application, in line with Rule 65(3) of the Rules.
Court disposition
Application struck out following withdrawal by the Applicant.
- The Applicant's request for withdrawal of the Application is granted.
- Application 057/2019 - XYZ v. Republic of Benin - is struck out from the cause list.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | AFRICAN UNION |  | AFRICAN UNION | |  | UNIÃO AFRICANA | | AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS COURS AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES | | |
XYZ
V.
REPUBLIC OF BENIN
APPLICATION NO. 057/2019
ORDER
(STRIKE-OUT)
6 FEBRUARY 2024
The Court composed of: Imani D. ABOUD, President; Modibo SACKO, Vice-President, Ben KIOKO, Rafaâ BEN ACHOUR, Suzanne MENGUE, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Dumisa B. NTSEBEZA, Dennis D. ADJEI - Judges, and Robert ENO, Registrar.
In the matter of:
*XYZ*
Self-represented.
Versus
*REPUBLIC OF BENIN*
Represented by Mr. Iréné ACOMBLESSI, the Judicial Agent of the Treasury.
after deliberation,
*pursuant to Rule 65(1) of the Rules,*
*Renders this order:*
THE PARTIES
XYZ (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant”) is a national of Benin. He requested anonymity, which was granted to him at the Fifty-third Ordinary Session of the Court. He alleges human rights violations in connection with judicial proceedings against Mr. Lionel Zinsou, former Prime Minister of the Republic of Benin.
The Application is filed against the Republic of Benin (hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent State”), which became a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Charter”) on 21 October 1986 and to the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Protocol”) on 22 August 2014. Furthermore, on 8 February 2016, the Respondent State deposited the Declaration provided for in Article 34(6) of the said Protocol (hereinafter “the Declaration”) by virtue of which it accepts the jurisdiction of the Court to receive applications from individuals and non-governmental organisations. On 25 March 2020, the Respondent State deposited with the African Union Commission the instrument of withdrawal of the said Declaration. The Court has held that this withdrawal has no effect on pending cases as well as new cases filed before 26 March 2021[[1]](#footnote-1), which is the day on which the withdrawal took effect, being a period of one (1) year after its deposit.
SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION
Facts of the matter
It emerges from the Application that in 2019, Lionel Zinsou, the former Prime Minister of the Respondent State, was accused and prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor’s Office for misrepresentation of his 2016 presidential campaign accounts to the Audit Chamber of the Supreme Court.
On 2 August 2019, in the said proceedings, the Cotonou trial court found Lionel Zinsou guilty of forgery and overspending of electoral campaign funds, and sentenced him to six (6) months’ suspended imprisonment and a fine of 50 million CFA francs. The trial court also declared him ineligible to run in any election for five (5) years. The said judgment was partially upheld on 18 February 2020 by the Court of Appeal of Cotonou.
Alleged violations
The Applicant alleges a violation of the right to the recognition and enforcement by the State of the rights, duties and freedoms set out in the Charter, the right to the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial protected by Articles 1, 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(d) of the Charter, respectively.
PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT
The Application together with a request for provisional measures was filed on 6 August 2019. On 15 August 2019, the Application was served on the Respondent State for its response on the request for provisional measures and the merits within fifteen (15) and sixty (60) days, respectively.
On 2 December 2019, the Court issued an Order dismissing the requested for provisional measures and this Order was served on the Parties on 18 December 2019.
The Parties filed their submissions on the merits and on reparations.
On 18 October 2023, the Applicant submitted a letter of discontinuance, which was notified to the Respondent State on 2 November 2023 for its response within seven (7) days of receipt. The Respondent State did not file a Response.
WITHDRAWAL OF PROCEEDINGS
The Court notes that Rule 65(1) of the Rules provides:
The Court may at any stage of the proceedings decide to strike out an Application from its cause list where:
An Applicant notifies the Court of his/her intention not to proceed with the case;
An Applicant fails to pursue his case within the time limit provided by the Court;
It, for any other reason, concludes that it is no longer justified to continue with the examination of the Application.
The Court notes, in the present case, that on 18 October 2023, the Applicant filed with the Registry a letter of discontinuance in respect of the present Application, evincing his intention not to pursue it.
Accordingly, the Court grants the Applicant’s request and, pursuant to Rule 65(1)(a) of the Rules, decides to strike out this Application from its cause list.
The Court points out that the striking out of the Application does not affect the right of the Applicant to apply for the re-listing of the Application, in line with Rule 65(3) of the Rules.
OPERATIVE PART
For these reasons:
THE COURT,
*Unanimously*
Grants the Applicant’s request for withdrawal of the Application;
*Strikes out* Application 057/2019 - *XYZ v. Republic of Benin* - from its cause list.
Signed by:
Imani D. ABOUD, President;
and Robert ENO, Registrar
Done at Arusha, this sixth day of February in the year Two Thousand and Twenty-four, in English and French, the French text being authoritative.
1. *Houngue Éric Noudehouenou v. Republic of Benin*, ACtHPR, Application No. 003/2020 Order of 5 2020 (provisional measures), §§ 4 to 5 and corrigendum of July 29, 2020 [↑](#footnote-ref-1)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.