Share
XYZ v Republic of Benin (Application No. 021/2019; Application No. 022/2019) [2019] AfCHPR 89 (4 July 2019)
- Citation
- [2019] AfCHPR 89
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Orè P
- Case number
- Application No. 021/2019 ; Application No. 022/2019
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Eno R, Kioko VP, Matusse J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Orè P
- Case number
- Application No. 021/2019 ; Application No. 022/2019
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court found that both applications were instituted by the same applicant against the same respondent state and concerned the same subject matter. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases where appropriate in fact and in law, the Court determined that a joinder was justified. The Court thus ordered the consolidation of the two applications and proceedings, to be henceforth treated as a single matter under the joint title.
Court disposition
applications joined and consolidated
Orders
- The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State is ordered.
- The Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 021/2019 and 022/2019 - XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.
02
Material facts
Parties
XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity)
ApplicantRepublic of Benin
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Order for Joinder of Cases
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the two applications by the same applicant against the same respondent state concerning the same subject matter should be joined.
- 02
Whether joinder is appropriate in fact and in law under Rule 54 of the Rules of Court.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant filed two separate applications against the Republic of Benin concerning related subject matter and parties. The applicant did not object to the joinder of the cases.
- Respondent
- The respondent state did not object to the joinder of the cases and did not file any submissions in opposition.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 54 of the Rules of Court
The Court may at any stage of the pleadings, either on its own volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court found that both applications were instituted by the same applicant against the same respondent state and concerned the same subject matter. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases where appropriate in fact and in law, the Court determined that a joinder was justified. The Court thus ordered the consolidation of the two applications and proceedings, to be henceforth treated as a single matter under the joint title.
Court disposition
applications joined and consolidated
- The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State is ordered.
- The Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 021/2019 and 022/2019 - XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment

THE MATTER OF
•
•
XYZ
(identified as such after requesting anonymity)
*v.*
REPUBLIC OF BENIN
APPLICATION No. 021/2019
AND
XYZ
(identified as such after requesting anonymity)
*v.*
REPUBLIC OF BENIN
APPLICATION No. 022/2019
ORDER
4 JULY 2019
| $\mathbb{R}^2$ | | | |--------------------------------------------------------|--|--| | PHOTOCOPIE CERTFIEE CONFORMER<br><b>CERTIFIED TRID</b> | | | | <b>REGISTRY</b> | | |
The Court composed of: Sylvain ORE, President, Ben KIOKO, Vice-President; Rataa BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Therese MUKAMULlSA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise CHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Imani D. ABOUD - Judges ; and Robert ENO, Registrar.
In the matter of:
•
•
XYZ
(identified as such after requesting anonymity)
*v.*
REPUBLIC 'OF BENIN
AND
XYZ
(identified as such after requesting anonymity)
*v.*
REPUBLIC OF BENIN
After deliberation, issues the following Order:
> 1. Having regard to the Application dated 13 May 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on the same date, by which XYZ (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant") instituted proceedings against the Republic of Benin (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State");
2. Having regard to the Application dated 27 May 2019 , received at the Registry on the same date, by which the same Applicant, XYZ instituted a second proceeding against "the Respondent State";
3. Considering Rule 54 of the Rules of Court which provides that: "the Court may at any stage of the pleadings either on its volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law" ;
4. Considering the identity of the Applicant. the Respondent State and the subject matter of the Applications in both cases;
5. Considering that a joinder of the cases is appropriate in fact and in law;
OPERATIVE PART
•
•
For these reasons , The Court unanimously, orders:
- i. The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State; - ii. That the Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 02 1/2019 and 022/2019- XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.
• Done at Arusha, this Twentieth Day of the month of June in the year Two Thousand and Nineteen, in English and French, the French text being authoritative.
> Signed Sylvain ORE, President Robert ENO, Registrar 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.