Download

Uganda Judgment

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

XYZ v Republic of Benin (Application No. 021/2019; Application No. 022/2019) [2019] AfCHPR 89 (4 July 2019)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court found that both applications were instituted by the same applicant against the same respondent state and concerned the same subject matter. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases where appropriate in fact and in law, the Court determined that a joinder was justified. The Court thus ordered the consolidation of the two applications and proceedings, to be henceforth treated as a single matter under the joint title.

Court disposition

applications joined and consolidated

Orders

  • The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State is ordered.
  • The Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 021/2019 and 022/2019 - XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.

02

Material facts

Parties

XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity)

Applicant

Republic of Benin

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Order for Joinder of Cases

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant filed two separate applications against the Republic of Benin concerning related subject matter and parties. The applicant did not object to the joinder of the cases.
Respondent
The respondent state did not object to the joinder of the cases and did not file any submissions in opposition.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 54 of the Rules of Court

    The Court may at any stage of the pleadings, either on its own volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court found that both applications were instituted by the same applicant against the same respondent state and concerned the same subject matter. In accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the joinder of interrelated cases where appropriate in fact and in law, the Court determined that a joinder was justified. The Court thus ordered the consolidation of the two applications and proceedings, to be henceforth treated as a single matter under the joint title.

Court disposition

applications joined and consolidated

  • The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State is ordered.
  • The Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 021/2019 and 022/2019 - XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.

Source and reliance status

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[2019] AfCHPR 89

![](_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg)

THE MATTER OF

XYZ

(identified as such after requesting anonymity)

*v.*

REPUBLIC OF BENIN

APPLICATION No. 021/2019

AND

XYZ

(identified as such after requesting anonymity)

*v.*

REPUBLIC OF BENIN

APPLICATION No. 022/2019

ORDER

4 JULY 2019

| $\mathbb{R}^2$ | | | |--------------------------------------------------------|--|--| | PHOTOCOPIE CERTFIEE CONFORMER<br><b>CERTIFIED TRID</b> | | | | <b>REGISTRY</b> | | |

The Court composed of: Sylvain ORE, President, Ben KIOKO, Vice-President; Rataa BEN ACHOUR, Angelo V. MATUSSE, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Therese MUKAMULlSA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise CHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Imani D. ABOUD - Judges ; and Robert ENO, Registrar.

In the matter of:

XYZ

(identified as such after requesting anonymity)

*v.*

REPUBLIC 'OF BENIN

AND

XYZ

(identified as such after requesting anonymity)

*v.*

REPUBLIC OF BENIN

After deliberation, issues the following Order:

> 1. Having regard to the Application dated 13 May 2019, received at the Registry of the Court on the same date, by which XYZ (hereinafter referred to as "the Applicant") instituted proceedings against the Republic of Benin (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State");

2. Having regard to the Application dated 27 May 2019 , received at the Registry on the same date, by which the same Applicant, XYZ instituted a second proceeding against "the Respondent State";

3. Considering Rule 54 of the Rules of Court which provides that: "the Court may at any stage of the pleadings either on its volition or in response to an application by any of the parties, order the joinder of interrelated cases and pleadings where it deems it appropriate, both in fact and in law" ;

4. Considering the identity of the Applicant. the Respondent State and the subject matter of the Applications in both cases;

5. Considering that a joinder of the cases is appropriate in fact and in law;

OPERATIVE PART

For these reasons , The Court unanimously, orders:

- i. The joinder of the cases and the proceedings in the Applications brought by the Applicant against the Respondent State; - ii. That the Application shall henceforth be titled Applications 02 1/2019 and 022/2019- XYZ (identified as such after requesting anonymity) v. Republic of Benin.

• Done at Arusha, this Twentieth Day of the month of June in the year Two Thousand and Nineteen, in English and French, the French text being authoritative.

> Signed Sylvain ORE, President Robert ENO, Registrar 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rule 54 of the Rules of Court

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.