Share
Wambura and Another v United Republic of Tanzania (Application No. 011/2016; Application No. 012/2016) [2023] AfCHPR 58 (21 May 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] AfCHPR 58
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Adjei J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko VP, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 011/2016 ; Application No. 012/2016
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Adjei J, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko VP, Tchikaya J
- Case number
- Application No. 011/2016 ; Application No. 012/2016
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court found that both applications originated from the same cause of action, involved co-accused individuals, and raised substantially similar claims regarding alleged violations of the right to a fair trial under Article 7 of the African Charter. The remedies sought were identical, and both applications were directed against the same respondent state. In accordance with Rule 62 of the Rules of Court and relevant case law, the Court determined that joinder was appropriate in fact and law, serving the interests of judicial economy and the proper administration of justice. Consequently, the Court ordered the consolidation of the two applications and related pleadings.
Court disposition
applications joined
Orders
- The joinder of Application No. 011/2016 – Chacha Wambura v. United Republic of Tanzania and Application No. 012/2016 – Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania and related pleadings.
- Henceforth, the joined applications shall be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications No. 011/2016 and 012/2016 – Chacha Wambura and Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania'.
- This order shall be duly notified to the parties.
02
Material facts
Parties
Chacha Wambura
Applicant Counsel: Self-representedMang’azi Mkama
Applicant Counsel: Self-representedUnited Republic of Tanzania
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Boniphace Nalija Luhende, Solicitor General; Ms. Sarah Duncan Mwaipopo, Deputy Solicitor General03
Procedural history
Posture
Joinder Application / Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the joinder of Application No. 011/2016 and Application No. 012/2016 is appropriate under Rule 62 of the Rules of Court.
- 02
Whether the applications raise substantially similar claims and remedies against the same respondent state.
- 03
Whether joinder serves the interests of judicial economy and proper administration of justice.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants, co-accused in domestic courts, filed separate applications alleging violations of their right to a fair trial under Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Both seek similar remedies: restoration of justice and quashing of conviction and sentence.
- Respondent
- The respondent state filed responses to both applications, addressing the allegations and defending the convictions and sentences. No objection to joinder is recorded in the order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 62, Rules of Court
The Court may, at any stage, order the joinder or disjoinder of cases and pleadings as it deems appropriate.
- 02
Elie Sandwidi v. Burkina Faso and 3 Others (26 June 2020) 4 AfCLR 203, § 5
Joinder is permissible where cases stem from the same cause of action and raise substantially similar claims, provided it serves judicial economy and proper administration of justice.
- 03
Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) (Joinder of Proceedings) 17 April 2013, § 18
Joinder must be consonant with the imperatives of judicial economy.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court found that both applications originated from the same cause of action, involved co-accused individuals, and raised substantially similar claims regarding alleged violations of the right to a fair trial under Article 7 of the African Charter. The remedies sought were identical, and both applications were directed against the same respondent state. In accordance with Rule 62 of the Rules of Court and relevant case law, the Court determined that joinder was appropriate in fact and law, serving the interests of judicial economy and the proper administration of justice. Consequently, the Court ordered the consolidation of the two applications and related pleadings.
Obiter and limits
- Joinder of cases is congruent with the demands of judicial economy and proper administration of justice.
- The consolidated applications shall henceforth be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications No. 011/2016 and 012/2016 – Chacha Wambura and Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania'.
Court disposition
applications joined
- The joinder of Application No. 011/2016 – Chacha Wambura v. United Republic of Tanzania and Application No. 012/2016 – Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania and related pleadings.
- Henceforth, the joined applications shall be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications No. 011/2016 and 012/2016 – Chacha Wambura and Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania'.
- This order shall be duly notified to the parties.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | |  | | | AFRICAN UNION | UNION AFRICAINE | | | | | | | |  | UNIÃO AFRICANA | | | | | | | | | AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS | | | | COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES | | | | | | |
THE MATTERS OF
CHACHA WAMBURA
V
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
APPLICATION NO. 011/2016
AND
MANG’AZI MKAMA
V
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
APPLICATION NO. 012/2016
ORDER
(JOINDER OF CASES)
21 MAY 2023
The Court composed of: Modibo SACKO, Vice-President; Ben KIOKO, Rafaậ BEN ACHOUR, Suzanne MENGUE, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Dumisa B. NTSEBEZA, Dennis D. ADJEI – Judges; and Robert ENO, Registrar.
In accordance with Article 22 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Protocol”) and Rule 9(2) of the Rules of Court (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”),[[1]](#footnote-1) Justice Imani D. ABOUD, President of the Court and a national of Tanzania, did not hear the Application.
In the Matters of:
Chacha WAMBURA
*Self-represented*
And
Mang’azi MKAMA
*Self-represented*
v.
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
*Represented* by:
Mr. Boniphace Nalija LUHENDE, Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General;
Ms. Sarah Duncan Mwaipopo, Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General.
After deliberations,
*Renders the following Order:*
Considering that Application No. 011/2016 and Application 012/2016 were filed on 26 February 2016 by Chacha Wambura and Mang’azi MKAMA, respectively, (hereinafter, “the Applicants”) against the United Republic of Tanzania (hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent State”) and were served on the Respondent State on 21 March 2016;
Noting that the Applicants were co-accused in domestic courts where they were charged, convicted and sentenced simultaneously; and that the Applications are directed against the same Respondent State;
Considering that the Respondent State filed its Responses to the two Applications on 28 March 2017 and 31 May 2017, respectively;
Considering further that Rule 62 of the Rules provides that: “The Court may, at any stage of the proceedings, either on its own accord or upon an application by any of the parties, order the joinder or disjoinder of cases and pleadings as it deems appropriate.”;
Observing that the Court may exercise its discretionary power to join two or more cases, where it is in the interest of the proper administration of justice, to hear and determine them at the same time,[[2]](#footnote-2) provided that such joinder must also be consonant with the imperatives of judicial economy;[[3]](#footnote-3)
Considering that in the instant case, both Applications stem from the same cause of action, and raise substantially similar claims in relation to alleged violation of the right to fair trial under Article 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Charter”) of the Applicants;
Considering further that similar remedies are prayed for in both Applications, namely, to “restore justice where it was overlooked and to quash both conviction and sentence”;
Considering that joining the two Applications would be congruent with the proper administration of justice and, in particular, with the demands of judicial economy;
Finding, therefore, that it is appropriate in fact and in law, pursuant to Rule 62 of the Rules, to join Application No. 011/2016 and Application No. 012/2016 which have been filed against the same Respondent State.
OPERATIVE PART
For these reasons,
THE COURT,
Unanimously,
*Orders*
The joinder of Application No. 011/2016 – *Chacha Wambura v. United Republic of Tanzania* and Application No. 012/2016 – *Mang’azi Mkama v. United Republic of Tanzania* and related pleadings;
That henceforth, the joined Applications shall be referred to as “Consolidated Applications No. 011/2016 and 012/2016 – *Chacha Wambura and Mang’azi Mkama* *v. United Republic of Tanzania*”, wherein *Chacha Wambura* will be referred to as “the First Applicant” and *Mang’azi Mkama* as “the Second Applicant” and together as “the Applicants”.
That consequent upon the joinder, this Order shall be duly notified to the Parties.
Signed:
Modibo SACKO, Vice President;
And Robert ENO, Registrar.
Done at Arusha, this Twenty First Day of May in the Year Two Thousand and Twenty-Three, in English and French, the English text being authoritative.
1. Rule 8(2), Rules of Court, 2 June 2010. [↑](#footnote-ref-1) 2. *Elie Sandwidi v. Burkina Faso and 3 Others* (joinder) (26 June 2020) 4 AfCLR 203, § 5. [↑](#footnote-ref-2) 3. *Certain Activities Carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)* (Joinder of Proceedings) 17 April 2013, § 18. [↑](#footnote-ref-3)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.