Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Walwanyi Wakholi v Kiyonga Ddungu and 4 Others (misc. application. No. 167 of 2025) [2025] UGHCLD 97 (23 June 2025)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application to amend the decree is premature because the applicant's letters of administration, granted in 1984, are subject to statutory lapse on 31st May 2025 under the amended Succession Act. The applicant must first obtain an extension or fresh grant of letters of administration before the decree in Civil Suit No. 52 of 2008 can be amended to reflect his name. Additionally, there is a discrepancy in the applicant's name as reflected in the letters of administration and the present application, which must be rectified to establish proper legal standing. The court, therefore, declines to grant the orders sought until these procedural requirements are satisfied.

Court disposition

application_dismissed

Orders

  • The application is prematurely before the court and is dismissed.
  • The applicant shall first obtain an extension or fresh grant of letters of administration before seeking amendment of the decree.
  • The applicant shall bear his own costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Walwanyi Charles Fredrick Wakholi

Applicant Counsel: M/s Luswata-Kibanda & Co. Advocates

Rogers Hanns Kiyonga Ddungu

Respondent

M. Tonda Njabala

Respondent

Nankya Njabala Mwamini

Respondent

Anthony Musoke

Respondent

The Registrar of Title

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that as the only surviving administrator of the estate of the late Hon. J. N. K. Wakholi, he is entitled to have the decree in HCCS No. 52 of 2008 amended to reflect his name, enabling execution of the judgment. He relied on the law of survivorship of administrators and Section 33 of the Judicature Act, which empowers the court to grant appropriate remedies. The applicant asserted that it is fair and just for the decree to be amended accordingly.
Respondent
The respondents did not file any affidavits in reply or written submissions despite being served. No arguments were presented by the respondents.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Succession Act, Section 269

    Upon the death of one or more of several executors or administrators, all the powers of the office become vested in the survivors or survivor.

  2. 02

    Judicature Act, Section 33

    Court has discretion to grant appropriate remedies, including amendment of decrees, where justice so requires.

  3. 03

    Succession Act, Section 337(2)

    Letters of administration granted before the 2022 amendment of the Succession Act lapse on 31st May 2025 unless extended.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application to amend the decree is premature because the applicant's letters of administration, granted in 1984, are subject to statutory lapse on 31st May 2025 under the amended Succession Act. The applicant must first obtain an extension or fresh grant of letters of administration before the decree in Civil Suit No. 52 of 2008 can be amended to reflect his name. Additionally, there is a discrepancy in the applicant's name as reflected in the letters of administration and the present application, which must be rectified to establish proper legal standing. The court, therefore, declines to grant the orders sought until these procedural requirements are satisfied.

Obiter and limits

  • The court noted that the respondents failed to participate in the proceedings despite being duly served.
  • Any amendment to the decree must be supported by valid and current letters of administration reflecting the applicant's correct legal identity.
  • The applicant may revert to court for amendment of the decree upon obtaining the necessary extension or fresh grant of letters of administration.

Court disposition

application_dismissed

  • The application is prematurely before the court and is dismissed.
  • The applicant shall first obtain an extension or fresh grant of letters of administration before seeking amendment of the decree.
  • The applicant shall bear his own costs.

Source and reliance status

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2025] UGHCLD 97

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (LAND DTVTSTON)

Mtsc. APPLTCATTON NO. 0167 0F 2024 (ARTSTNG OUT OF CrVrL SUrT NO. 0052 OF 2008)

WALWANYI CHARLES FREDRICK WAKHOLI :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT (Administrator of the Estate of the Late Hon J N. K Wakholi)

VERSUS

- 1 ROGERS HANNS KIYONGA DDUNGU - 2 M. TONDA NJABALA - 3 NANKYA NJABALA MWAMINI - 4 ANTHONY MUSOKE - 5 THE REGISTRAR OF TITLE

RESPONDENTS

Before. Hon. Ladv Justice Dr. Christine A. Echookit

RULING

INTRODUCTION:

- [1] This application was brought under Section 33 of the Judicature Act, Section 273 of the Succession Act Cap 162 and Order 52 rules '1 & 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules for orders that; - 1. The Decree in HCCS No. 52 of 2008 be altered/amended to reflect the name of the Applicant the only surviving Administrator of the Estate of the late Hon. J. N K Wakholi - 2. Each Pafiy bears its own Costs.

Walwanyi Charles Fredrick Wakholi, and are briefly that;

GROUNDS OF THE APPLICATION:

[2] The grounds in support of this application are set out in the affidavit of the Applicant

q

- a) Walwanyi Charles and Henry N. K Wabuyi applied and were granted letters of administration vide High Court Admin. Cause No. 175 of 1984 on 31il July 1984. - b) Henry N. K Wabuyi co-administrator filed and successfully prosecuted HCCS No. 52 of 2008 in his capacity as one of the administrators of the estate of the late Hon. J. N. K. Wakholi. - c) Court delivered ludgment in HCCS No. 52 of 2008 in favour of the estate of the late Hon. J. N. K Wakholi the Judgment Creditor. - d) Before the execution of the decree, Henry N. K. Wabuyi the co-Administrator of the Estate of the late Hon. J. N. K. Wakholi whose name featured in the Judgment and the decree in HCCS No. 52 of 2008 as the Plaintiff, died. - e) The death of Henry N. K. Wabuyi a co-administrator makes it impossible to proceed with execution of the decree without the remaining legal representative being reflected in the decree. - f) The Applicant Walwanyi Charles Fredrick Wakholi is the only surviving Administrator of the estate of the late Hon J. N. K. Wakholi and applies for amendment or alteration of the decree to reflect his name. - g) lt is fair, just and in the interest of justice that this application is granted - [3] Viola Aleto of C/o M/s Luswata-Kibanda & Co. Advocates filed an affidavit of service to the effect that she served copies of the Notice of lVotion to the Respondents on the 13th tr

day of February 2024, lo attend court on 1 Sth day of February 2024. Ihe Respondents did not file any affidavits in reply.

BACKGROUND:

- [4] The late J. N. K. Wakholi was initially the registered proprietor of several plots of land situated on Kaydondo Block244 Plots No. 1654, 1656, 1657 and 1658. After J N. K Wakholi's death in 1972, Walwanyi Charles and Henry N K Wabuyi became administrators of his estate by Letters of Administration granted in 1984. Henry N K Wabuyi was entered on the register as proprietor of the described plots of land. - [5] Sometime in 1984, Henry N. K Wabuyi sold Plot 1654 to ROGERS HANNS KIYONGA DDUNGU the l,tRespondent. After he signed the transfer for Plot 1654 to be transferred into ROGERS HANNS KIYONGA DDUNGU's names, the transfer instrument was interfered with and two extra plots vide Plot 1655 and 1656, which he had not sold to ROGERS HANNS KIYONGA DDUNGU were added thereon and also transferred into the 1st Respondent's names. Thereafter, the 1't Respondent effected sub-divisions by creating Plots 3593 and 3954 from Plot 1655, and PIot 3680 from Plot 1656. The 1st Respondent then transferred Plot 3679 into the 2tu and 3d Respondents' names for no consideration. He also donated Plot 3680 as a gift to the 4th Respondent - [6] Judgment was delivered by the Hon. Justice Bashaija K. Andrew in favour of Henry N. K Wabuyi on 19th day of August 2016 with the following declarations and orders; - a) The plaintiff (Henry N. K Wabuyi) as the Administrator of the Estate of the Late Joshua N. K. Wakholi, is entitled to the possession of the property comprised in the said Kyadondo Block244 PIot Nos. 3679 and 3680 formerly Plot N0.1656. - b) lt is ordered that the names of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants be cancelled from the register and certificate of titles for Kyadondo Block244 Plot Nos. 3679 and <sup>3680</sup> q'

![](_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg)

(formerly Plot 1656)be replaced thereof with the names of the Plaintiff as the legal representative of the late Joshua. N. K. Wakholi.

- c) lt is ordered that Kyadondo Block244 Plot Nos.3679 and 3680 be merged and the suit property do revert to its original status of Plot No. 1656. - d) An eviction order doth issue against those presently in occupation. - e) A Permanent injunction doth issue restraining the defendants or their agents or workers and servants from entering and carrying out any activity upon the suit premises, - f) The defendants pay the costs of the suit. - [7] N. KWabuyithePlaintiffdiedonthe2ndofJanuary2022beforeexecutingthedecree and orders of court. A death certificate NIRA No. 59857 issued on l Bth day of July 2022 was attached to the Applicant's affidavit. Hence, this application to amend and or alter the Decree to reflect the name of the Applicant as Judgment Creditor to enable him to execute the Decree.

REPRESENTATION AND HEARING:

[B] The Applicant was represented by IVI/s Luswata - Kibanda & Co, Advocates and filed written submissions.

ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION BY THE COURT:

- [9] The Applicant raised one issue for determination by the courl; - 1. Whether Couft has power to amend the Decree to reflect the name of the Applicant?

DETERMINATION OF THE ISSUES BY COURT:

M Since the Respondents did not file any affidavits in reply nor written submissions despite being served, I will rely only on the affidavit evidence and submissions of the Applicant, court proceedings in the main suit and applicable law, to make my decision.

Submissions of counsel for the Applicant;

- [1 0] Counsel cited the law of survivorship of administrators to the effect that upon the death of one or more of several executors or administrators, all the powers of the office become vested in the survivors or survivor. - ['1 1]Counsel referred to the powers of court under Section 33 of the Judicature Act, to grant appropriate remedies, as a justification for this court to amend or alter the Decree to reflect the name of the Applicant as the surviving administrator.

Consideration by court;

- [12]The letters of administration to the estate of the late Hon. N. K. Wakholi were granted to Walwanyi Charles and Henry N. K Wabuyi on 31st of July 1984 vide High Court Admin Cause No. 175of 1984. Henry N. KWabuyisued in CivilSuit No. 52of 2008, seeking reliefs as an administrator to the estate of the late Joshua N. K Wakholi. This courl recognized him as such in the judgement delivered on the 19th of August 20'16 - [13]Section 269 of the Succession Act Cap. 268 empowers the surviving administrato(s) to continue exercising the powers of administration of the estate of a deceased person. However, court precedent has evolved that the survivrng administrator would need to be endorsed as such by the beneficiaries of the estate of the late Joshua N. K Wakholi by an application filed in Court for the purpose lt is only then that the sard administrator would have a right to have the Decree in Civil Suit No. 52 of 2008 amended/altered to reflect his name, by the exercise of court of its discretion under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 2S2loaward appropriate remedies by power of Section 37 of the Judicature Act, Cap.

16. K

[14]That notwithstanding, as shown in Section 337(2) of the Succession Act, Cap. 268, letters of administration granted before the amendment of the Succession Act in 2022 lapsed on 31il day of I'Aay 2025.|f the estate did not seek an extension of the Letters of Administration granted vide High Court Admin. Cause No. 175 of 1984 , they will have to apply afresh and then revert to this court to reflect the amendment on the Decree in Civil Suit No. 52 of 2008, subject to the validity period for decrees of court.

ln any event, the names of the Applicant in the letters of administration granted vide High Court Admin. Cause No. 175 of 1 984 are Walwanyi Charles and not Walwanyi Charles Fredrick Wakholi as reflected in the present application. Hence, there ought to be either a correction of name or a reflection of both names to identify the Applicant as the same person to whom the Letters of Administration was granted.

ln the premises, I am unable to grant the orders sought

DECISION OF COURT:

[15] ln the final result;

- a) This application is prematurely before this court. - b) The Applicant shall first obtain an extension of Letters of Administration granted vide High Court Admin. Cause No. 175 of 1984 or a grant of fresh Letters of Administration, before the Decree in Civil Suit No. 52 of 2008 can be amended/altered to reflect his name alone or together with another administrator of the estate of the late Joshua N. K Wakholi.

) The Applicant shall bear his own costs. q--c

I so order

Dated at Kampala this. $23^{\text{rad}}$ day of. $\frac{\text{J}}{\text{V}}$ Dated at Kampala this.

the but .<br>. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hon. Lady Justice Dr. Christine A. Echookit Judge.

$\ddot{\phantom{a}}$

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Judicature Act, Section 33

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Succession Act, Sections 269, 273, 337(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Act, Section 98

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Rules, Order 52 rules 1 & 3

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.