Download

Uganda Judgment

Supreme Court of Uganda

Vimila Thakkar v Lalita Minilal Raja and Ors [2004] UGSC 20 (22 June 2004)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Supreme Court found that neither party could claim to have wholly succeeded or failed in the litigation, as both contributed to the dispute's escalation and neither acted with complete candour or diligence. The appellant was not solely responsible for the necessity of court proceedings, as the respondents failed to clearly communicate the revised rent and did not facilitate settlement. The lower courts erred in awarding costs to the respondents alone. The appeal was allowed on the issue of costs, with the Supreme Court ordering that each party bear its own costs at all levels, reflecting the shared responsibility for the dispute and the settlement reached.

Court disposition

appeal_allowed_in_part

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds on the issue of costs.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs in the Supreme Court and in the courts below.

02

Material facts

Parties

Vimila Thakkar

Appellant

Lalita Minilal Raja

Respondent Counsel: Godfrey Lule, S.C.

Pradip Nandlal Karia

Respondent Counsel: Godfrey Lule, S.C.

Nandlal Harjivan Karia

Respondent Counsel: Godfrey Lule, S.C.

Tribhovanda Madhavji Dattani

Respondent Counsel: Godfrey Lule, S.C.

Pabco Properties Ltd.

Respondent Counsel: Godfrey Lule, S.C.

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant, representing herself, argued that the courts below erred in awarding costs to the respondents as their findings were not based on the facts and circumstances. She contended she was unaware of the revised rent until after filing suit and had always offered to pay what was reflected in the original sublease. She further argued that the respondents failed to communicate the actual amount due and were more interested in reentry than resolving the rent issue.
Respondent
Counsel for the respondents, Mr. Godfrey Lule, S.C., submitted that the appellant was aware of her obligations and the revised rent, having been in constant communication. He argued that the appellant insisted on paying the outdated rent and that her intransigence necessitated court proceedings. He maintained that both lower courts were correct in awarding costs to the respondents.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 27, Civil Procedure Act (Cap 71)

    Costs generally follow the event, but the court has discretion to depart from this rule where justice so requires.

  2. 02

    Equitable maxim, cited in judgment

    He who comes to equity must come with clean hands.

  3. 03

    General principle of costs; see also precedent in Uganda courts

    A party who unreasonably refuses to settle or causes unnecessary litigation may be penalized in costs.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Supreme Court found that neither party could claim to have wholly succeeded or failed in the litigation, as both contributed to the dispute's escalation and neither acted with complete candour or diligence. The appellant was not solely responsible for the necessity of court proceedings, as the respondents failed to clearly communicate the revised rent and did not facilitate settlement. The lower courts erred in awarding costs to the respondents alone. The appeal was allowed on the issue of costs, with the Supreme Court ordering that each party bear its own costs at all levels, reflecting the shared responsibility for the dispute and the settlement reached.

Obiter and limits

  • Neither the appellant nor the respondents' behaviour conformed to the maxim that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands.
  • The impression from the pleadings and submissions is that each party wanted to eat their proverbial cake and have it at the same time.
  • The respondents failed to demand the actual amount of what 25% of the revised rent represented and did not volunteer information about the revised rent.
  • Letters threatening reentry were sent to the appellant in the UK without ensuring prompt delivery or communication through her local agents.

Court disposition

appeal_allowed_in_part

  • The appeal succeeds on the issue of costs.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs in the Supreme Court and in the courts below.

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2004] UGSC 20

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff38\stshfdbch0\stshfloch38\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f1\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604020202020204}Arial;} {\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}{\f38\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02030602050306030303}Constantia;}{\f273\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f274\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;} {\f276\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f277\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f278\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f279\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);} {\f280\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f281\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f283\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Arial CE;}{\f284\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Arial Cyr;}{\f286\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Arial Greek;} {\f287\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Arial Tur;}{\f288\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Arial (Hebrew);}{\f289\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Arial (Arabic);}{\f290\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Arial Baltic;}{\f291\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Arial (Vietnamese);} {\f623\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f624\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Tahoma Cyr;}{\f626\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f627\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma

Tur;}{\f628\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);} {\f629\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f630\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f631\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f632\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}{\f653\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Constantia CE;} {\f654\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Constantia Cyr;}{\f656\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Constantia Greek;}{\f657\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Constantia Tur;}{\f660\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Constantia Baltic;}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255; \red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0; \red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0

\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\loch\f38\hich\af0\dbch\af0\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-486\slmult0 \nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Style1;}{\s16\qc \li0\ri0\sl-322\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Style2;}{\s17\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 Style3;}{\s18\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext18 Style4;}{\s19\qj \li0\ri0\sl-484\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext19 Style5;}{ \s20\ql \fi1296\li0\ri0\sl-312\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext20 Style6;}{\s21\qj \li0\ri0\sl-264\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext21 Style7;}{\s22\qj \li0\ri0\sl-320\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext22 Style8;}{ \s23\ql

\fi-720\li0\ri0\sl-478\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext23 Style9;}{\s24\qc \li0\ri0\sl-326\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext24 Style10;}{\s25\ql \fi413\li0\ri0\sl-312\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext25 Style11;}{ \s26\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext26 Style12;}{\s27\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext27 Style13;}{\s28\ql \li0\ri0\sl-446\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext28 Style14;}{\s29\qj \fi-730\li0\ri0\sl-475\slmult0 \nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext29 Style15;}{\s30\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext30 Style16;}{\s31\ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext31 Style17;}{\s32\ql

\fi874\li0\ri0\sl-326\slmult0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext32 Style18;}{\*\cs33 \additive \f1\fs26 \sbasedon10 Font Style20;}{\*\cs34 \additive \b\f1\fs26 \sbasedon10 Font Style21;}{\*\cs35 \additive \b\i\f1\fs26 \sbasedon10 Font Style22;}{\*\cs36 \additive \b\i\f0\fs24 \sbasedon10 Font Style23;}{\*\cs37 \additive \b\i\f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style24;}{\*\cs38 \additive \f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style25;}{\*\cs39 \additive \b\f35\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style26;}{\*\cs40 \additive \f0\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style27;}{\*\cs41 \additive \i\f1\fs26 \sbasedon10 Font Style28;}{\*\cs42 \additive \b\f38\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style29;}{\*\cs43 \additive \f0\fs40 \sbasedon10 Font Style30;}{\*\cs44 \additive \f0\fs22 \sbasedon10 Font Style31;}{\*\cs45 \additive \f35\fs30 \sbasedon10 Font Style32;}{\*\cs46 \additive \f1\fs26 \sbasedon10 Font Style33;}{\*\cs47 \additive \f1\fs30\expnd-6\expndtw-30 \sbasedon10 Font Style34;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable {\list\listtemplateid1098841648\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelold\levelspace0\levelindent398{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f1\fbias0 }{\listname

;}\listid90132232} {\list\listtemplateid2030851914\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelold\levelspace0\levelindent730{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f1\fbias0 }{\listname ;}\listid362023957} {\list\listtemplateid636378946\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat4\levelold\levelspace0\levelindent725{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f1\fbias0 }{\listname ;}\listid614750781}} {\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid90132232\listoverridecount0\ls1}{\listoverride\listid90132232\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelold\levelspace0 \levelindent398{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f35\fbias0 }}\ls2}{\listoverride\listid362023957\listoverridecount0\ls3}{\listoverride\listid362023957\listoverridecount1{\lfolevel\listoverrideformat{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0 \leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelold\levelspace0\levelindent730{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\f0\fbias0 }}\ls4}{\listoverride\listid614750781\listoverridecount0\ls5}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2695417\rsid16002248}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\author owner}{\operator

owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo2\dy26\hr17\min22}{\revtim\yr2008\mo2\dy26\hr17\min25}{\version2}{\edmins3}{\nofpages8}{\nofwords1596}{\nofchars9098}{\nofcharsws10673}{\vern24689}} \paperw11905\paperh16837\margl1769\margr1769\margt1352 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\horzdoc\dghspace120\dgvspace120\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow3 \jcompress\viewkind1\viewscale100\nolnhtadjtbl\rsidroot2695417 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2695417 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2695417 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2695417 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\nowidctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2695417 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \sbknone\linex0\colsx60\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\header \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid2695417 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta

.}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sb67\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par }\pard\plain \s16\qc \li1565\ri1574\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin1574\lin1565\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s16\qc \li1565\ri1574\sb86\sl-322\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin1574\lin1565\itap0 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT MENGO \par }\pard\plain \s24\qc \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s24\qc \li0\ri0\sb91\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs35\b\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 (CORAM: ODOKI, CJ., ODER, TSEKOOKO, KAROKORA, \par }\pard

\s24\qc \li0\ri0\sl-634\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs35\b\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 KANYEIHAMBA, JJ. S. C.) \par }\pard\plain \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sl-634\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2003 \par }\pard \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sb5\sl-634\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 BETWEEN \par }\pard \s27\qj \li0\ri0\sb5\sl-638\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 VIMILA THAKKAR ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT \par }\pard \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sl-638\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 AND \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s31 \cs34\b\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 1.\tab}}\pard\plain \s31\ql \li0\ri0\sl-638\slmult0\widctlpar\tx398\tx5592{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart1\pnindent398 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls1\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 LALITA MINILAL RAJA}{\cs34\f0\fs20\insrsid2695417 \tab }{\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 ] \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s31 \cs34\b\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 2.\tab}}\pard \s31\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tx398\tx5587{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart1\pnindent398 {\pntxta

.}}\faauto\ls1\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 { \cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 PRADIP NANDLAL KARIA}{\cs34\f0\fs20\insrsid2695417 \tab }{\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 ] \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s31 \cs34\b\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 3.\tab}}\pard \s31\qj \li0\ri0\sl-331\slmult0\widctlpar\tx398\tx5592{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart1\pnindent398 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls1\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 NANDLAL HARJIVAN KARIA}{\cs34\f0\fs20\insrsid2695417 \tab }{\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 ] ::: RESPONDENTS \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s31 \cs34\b\f35\fs26 \hich\af35\dbch\af0\loch\f35 4.\tab}}\pard \s31\ql \li0\ri0\sl-331\slmult0\widctlpar\tx398{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls2\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf35\pnstart1\pnindent398 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls2\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 TRIBHOVANDA MADHAVJI DATTANI ]}{\cs39\b\f35\fs22\insrsid2695417 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s31 \cs34\b\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 5.\tab}}\pard \s31\ql \li0\ri0\sl-331\slmult0\widctlpar\tx398\tx5587{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart1\pnindent398 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls1\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 PABCO PROPERTIES LTD.}{\cs34\f0\fs20\insrsid2695417 \tab }{\cs34\b\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 ] \par }\pard\plain \s22\qj

\li744\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin744\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s22\qj \li744\ri0\sb77\sl-312\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin744\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 [An appeal from the judgment and decision of t he Court of Appeal, (Mukasa-Kikonyogo, D. C. J., Kato, Kitumba, JJ. A.), dated 20.11.2001 in Civil Appeal No. 52 Of 2000]. \par }\pard\plain \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s27\qc \li0\ri0\sb106\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs34\b\f1\fs26\ul\insrsid2695417 JUDGMENT OF COURT \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb192\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 A suit in which the appellant and respondents were parties involved the payment of rent and the power of reentry in r elation to a sublease registered as Volume 1 Folio 24 and known as Plot No. 6 and 6A, Market Street, Kampala. The suit was eventually disposed of by consent of parties in the High Court. The facts and resolutions in the agreement are not relevant to this appeal. Be that as it may, in the High Court before Ntabgoba, P. J., the parties to the suit reached an

understanding which was tantamount to a settlement of all the disputes between them and the learned}{\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 }{ \cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Principal Judge reflected this understanding in his judgment. When it came to costs of the High Court suit, the court awarded the costs to the present respondents on the ground that it was the appellant who was solely responsible for the suit because of h e r intransigence in refusing to pay her due contributions and unreasonably seeking to pay the 1933 fixed rent which defeated reason. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal challenging the decision and reasoning of the learned Principal Judge on cost s. The appellant lost her appeal principally because the learned Justices of the Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge and confirmed his award of costs to the respondent. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The appellant has now appealed to this court. The grounds of appeal as framed in her Memorandum of Appeal are as follows: \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s29 \cs41\i\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 1.\tab}}\pard\plain \s29\qj \fi-730\li730\ri0\sb485\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\tx730{\*\pn

\pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls3\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart1\pnindent730 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls3\rin0\lin730\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred In law and fact in arriving at the wrong conclusion that the appellant was not justified in filing the suit against the respondents in the High Court.}{\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s29 \cs41\i\fs26 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 2.\tab}}\pard \s29\qj \fi-730\li730\ri0\sb485\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\tx730\tlul\tx1963{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls4\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent730 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls4\rin0\lin730\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred in law and fact when they ordered the appellant to bear the costs due to her conduct prior to the filing of the suit on 6}{ \cs41\i\f1\fs26\super\insrsid2695417 th}{\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 February, 1955.}{\cs36\b\i\f0\expnd6\expndtw30\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard\plain \s23\qj \fi-725\li725\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin725\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s23\qj \fi-725\li725\ri0\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin725\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 3. }{\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The

learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred in law and fact when they confirmed the decision of the learned Principal Judge that the suit was brought by intransigence of \par }\pard\plain \s19\qj \li734\ri0\sb67\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin734\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 the appellant in refusing to pay the due contribution and as such was to pay the costs. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s29 \cs41\i\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 4.\tab}}\pard\plain \s29\qj \fi-725\li725\ri0\sb485\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\tx725{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls5\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart4\pnindent725 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls5\rin0\lin725\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred in law and fact when they confirmed the decision of the learned Principal Judge that it was reasonable for the respondents to demand a contribution of 25% of the new statutory ground rent and it was unreason able for the appellant to insist on paying the sum set out in the sublease agreement.}{\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s29 \cs41\i\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 5.\tab}}\pard \s29\ql \fi-725\li725\ri0\sb470\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\tx725{\*\pn

\pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls5\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart4\pnindent725 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls5\rin0\lin725\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred in law and fact when they failed to evaluate the evidence on record as a first appellant (sic.) court and arrived at a wrong decision when they upheld the learned Principal Judge's decision. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\s29 \cs41\i\f1\fs26 \hich\af1\dbch\af0\loch\f1 6.\tab}}\pard \s29\qj \fi-725\li725\ri0\sb490\sl-470\slmult0\widctlpar\tx725{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls5\pnrnot0\pndec\pnf1\pnstart4\pnindent725 {\pntxta .}} \faauto\ls5\rin0\lin725\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The learned Judges of the Court of Appeal erred in law and fact in holding that because the appellant compromised with the respondent, therefore she was not the successful party. \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb230\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Considering that the partie s reached a settlement which was recorded in the trial court, we find that only grounds 2 and 3 of the appeal are pertinently relevant. The other grounds, namely, 1, 4, 5 and 6 should be subsumed in the settlement

arrangement accepted and recorded by the learned Principal Judge in his reasoned judgment and as confirmed by the learned Justices of Appeal. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 On ground 2, the appellant who represented herself submitted that in awarding costs to the respondent, both courts below erred in that their findings and decisions were not founded on the facts and circumstances of the case. Appellant contended that it was not until she went to court that the fact of the rent revision was raised. The appellant further contended that until she acquired that knowledge there w as no way she could have known the value of the 25% payable for the sublease of which she was tenant. She contended that until she discovered the figures herself from Kampala City Council, the only rent payable she knew of was what was reflected in the or iginal sublease agreement of 1933 which she duly and diligently offered to pay. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb235\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 For the respondent, Mr. Godfrey Lule, S. C, submitted that the respondents had been in

constant touch with the appellant to remind her of her obligations with regard to the subl ease. He submitted that when she eventually responded, she insisted on paying the original rent of Shs. 53/75 fixed as long ago as 1933 when the sublease was first granted to her predecessors. Counsel further contended that there is evidence that the appe llant was fully aware that the rent payable was 25% of the annual rent for the head lease assessed by the Kampala City Council at Shs.348,355/=. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb226\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Mr. Lule contended that since the appellant had finally accepted to pay the 25% of the true assessed figure, sh e ought not have filed a suit and as she had relied on a lower figure as the basis of her action, she was the loser and not the winner of the suit. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb230\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 On ground 3, the appellant contended that the Principal Judge was wrong to hold and the Justices of Appeal were in error to confirm that it had been through the appellant's intransigence that court proceedings became

necessary. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb5\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 In the appellant's view, she did all she could to pay her rent. Firstly, when she first received a demand note, that note did not spe cify how much had been revised and assessed by the City Council. Consequently, there was no way she could ascertain what amount represented the 25% contribution from her. She further contended that in the absence of such an ascertained amount, she was jus t ified in tendering to the respondents the original fixed rent in the sum of Shs. 53/75 per month plus all the outstanding arrears. The appellant contended that the evidence available suggests that the respondents were no longer interested in keeping her a s a subtenant. They appeared to be preoccupied with reentry and repossession. In support of this claim by the appellant she pointed out that even when she sent the sum of U. K. \'a3 300 which was adequate to cover the new revised rent and advised the respondents to inform her whether that amount was adequate and if not, for her to send more money, the respondents kept silent. She contended that even the lawyers of the respondents themselves did not know the amount payable. \par }\pard \s15\qj

\li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb230\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 For the respondent, on ground 3, Mr. Lule contended that the appellant was solely responsible for the protracted correspondence between the parties and for the necessity to go to court. He submitted that by the time the appellant chose to go to court she already knew the revised rent and the amount due to the respondents. He contended that therefore both the High Court and the Court of Appeal were correct in their findings and respective reasoning. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb10\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Having heard the appellant and counsel for the respon dents and read the record of proceedings, we are not persuaded that either party can claim correctly that they won or their opponents lost the case. Neither side appears to have done all they could have done to finally settle their dispute. Neither the ap pellant nor the respondents' behaviour and acts conform to the old equitable }{\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 maxim }{\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 that he who comes to equity must come with clean hands. The impression one gets

from the pleadings and submissions in this case is that each party wanted to eat their proverb ial cake and have it at the same time. The appellant appeared to insist on paying the original fixed rent of Shs. 53/75 per month even though she was fully aware that it was no longer economically viable and the 25% payable was not of any figure other tha n what the Kampala City Council had statutorily demanded, namely, Shs.348,355/=. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb10\sl-475\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 The respondents failed to demand the actual amount of what 25% of the revised rent represented. They did not volunteer any information about the revised rent. It was only the appellant or her lawyers who took initiative to find out. They refused to accept her payment as part payment and demand the balance. They did not acknowledge or respond to her suggestions regarding the \'a3 300 which she sent through her lawyers. Their total demand of some US $ 500 is not fully explained. However, the respondents were very clear on reentry. The letter written by Pradip N. Karia of Pabco Properties Ltd. on 14 December, 1993, is confusing and inexplicable just as his other subsequent letter dat ed 21 January, 1994. The letter is worded thus, \par

}\pard\plain \s22\ql \li758\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin758\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s22\ql \li758\ri0\sb154\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin758\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 "Dear Madam, \par }\pard \s22\ql \li749\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin749\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s22\ql \li749\ri0\sb91\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin749\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\ul\insrsid2695417 GROUND RENT DEMAND \par }\pard \s22\ql \li744\ri0\sb19\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin744\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\ul\insrsid2695417 PLOT 6A MARKET STREET, KAMPALA \par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sb96\sl-317\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 We kindly bring to your notice that the above ground rent has not been paid by your Attorney Vinila Thakkar who was requested to pay the same as per sub-lease requirement. You note that you have also failed to do the same for this year. \par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sb77\sl-317\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 We also bring to your attention that there are some immediate repairs which are required on the buildings which should be effected also.

\par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s22\qj \li739\ri0\sb72\sl-322\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin739\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Also note that if we do not receive any payments within }{\cs36\i\f0\expnd6\expndtw30\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 21}{ \cs36\b\i\f0\insrsid2695417 }{\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 days date hereof then we shall move the Registrar to make a re-entry. \par }\pard \s22\ql \li744\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin744\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par }\pard \s22\ql \li744\ri0\sb91\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin744\itap0 {\cs41\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Please treat this as final notice." \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb182\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 These letters threatened to activate re-entry within a short period notwithstanding that t hey were being sent to the appellant at her address in Leicester, U. K. There is no evidence that they were being sent by any quicker method of communication nor were the respondents minded to ensure that these letters were delivered and received by the ap p ellant. Interestingly, long before these letters were written and dispatched, the respondents had been clearly informed by the appellant through her

lawyers that she had agents in Kampala who could receive her letters and who were authorised to act on her behalf. The letter from Messrs Katende, Ssempebwa & Co. Advocates, dated 12}{\cs33\f1\fs26\super\insrsid2695417 th}{\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 April, 1994, clearly reveals this knowledge. \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sb10\sl-480\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\cs33\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417 Under these circumstances, it is our view that both the High Court and Court of Appeal erred in awarding costs to the respondents. We are satisfied that grounds 2 and 3 substantially succeed. Consequently, this appeal succeeds. We order that each party pays its costs in this court and in the courts below. \par }\pard\plain \s30\qj \li0\ri0\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s30\qc \li0\ri0\sb115\widctlpar\tldot\tx5016\tldot\tx6965\faauto\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs33\b\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 Dated at Mengo, this 22}{\cs33\b\i\f1\fs26\super\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 nd}{ \cs33\b\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 day of June 2004.}{\cs33\b\i\f1\fs26\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par }\pard\plain \s25\ql

\fi331\li3110\ri2688\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin2688\lin3110\itap0 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs20\insrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s25\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sb144\sl-322\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs34\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 B}{\cs45\b\f1\expnd-4\expndtw-20\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 . J. ODOKI }{ \cs45\b\f1\expnd-4\expndtw-20\insrsid2695417 \line }{\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 CHIEF JUSTICE}{\cs34\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par }\pard\plain \s30\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s30\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sb149\widctlpar\tlhyph\tx2726\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs33\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 A. H. O. ODER \par }\pard\plain \s31\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sb5\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par }\pard\plain \s16\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s16\qc

\fi9\li0\ri15\sb187\sl-307\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs34\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 J. W. N}{\cs47\b\f1\expnd-6\expndtw-30\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 . }{ \cs47\b\f1\expnd-6\expndtw-30\insrsid2695417 TSEKOOKO}{\cs47\b\f1\expnd-6\expndtw-30\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 }{\cs47\b\f1\expnd-6\expndtw-30\insrsid2695417 \par }{\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 JUSTICE OF T}{\cs34\b\f1\ul\expnd-4\expndtw-20\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 HE}{\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 SUPREME COURT \par }\pard\plain \s20\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s20\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sb134\sl-307\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs33\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 A. N. KAROKORA }{\cs33\b\f1\insrsid2695417 \par }{\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par }\pard\plain \s32\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sl-240\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 \f38\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 \par \par }\pard \s32\qc \fi9\li0\ri15\sb158\sl-326\slmult0\widctlpar\faauto\rin15\lin0\itap0\pararsid2695417 {\cs33\b\f1\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 G. W. KANYEIHAMBA }{\cs33\b\f1\insrsid2695417 \par }{\cs34\b\f1\ul\insrsid2695417\charrsid2695417 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Act (Cap 71)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.