Share
Uganda v Katende Kasmoni - High Court Criminal Revisional Cause No. MSK-00-CR-CV-0014 of 1999 (High Court Revision Cause No. MSK -00-CR CV- 0014 of 1999) [1999] UGHC 6 (25 August 1999)
- Citation
- [1999] UGHC 6
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Revision / Revisional Order
- Case number
- High Court Revision Cause No. MSK -00-CR CV- 0014 of 1999
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Revision / Revisional Order
- Case number
- High Court Revision Cause No. MSK -00-CR CV- 0014 of 1999
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The conviction for escaping from lawful custody cannot stand where the underlying custody has been quashed for being unlawful. The substratum of the offence disappears when the original conviction and sentence are set aside. Furthermore, the trial court failed to afford the accused an opportunity to mitigate sentence and imposed a sentence based on irrelevant considerations, violating principles of fair trial and natural justice. Both the conviction and sentence are set aside, and the accused is ordered to remain at liberty.
Court disposition
conviction and sentence set aside; accused discharged
Orders
- The charge of escaping from lawful custody is dismissed.
- Conviction and sentence are set aside.
- The accused is forthwith to remain at liberty.
02
Material facts
Parties
Uganda
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Khaukha, Resident Senior State AttorneyKatende Kasmoni
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Revision / Revisional Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the conviction for escaping from lawful custody was valid after the original custody was quashed.
- 02
Whether the accused was afforded a fair hearing, including the right to mitigate sentence.
- 03
Whether the sentence imposed was excessive and based on proper legal reasoning.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Mr. Khaukha, for the state, argued that the plea was properly taken but the sentence was excessive. He submitted that the offence was a misdemeanor and the trial court should have considered an option of a fine or a lesser term of imprisonment, especially given the accused's time already spent in custody.
- Respondent
- The accused did not have legal representation or submit arguments directly. The Chief Magistrate forwarded the file for revision, highlighting irregularities in the recording of the plea, denial of mitigation opportunity, and improper reasoning for the sentence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Penal Code Act, Section 103
Custody must be lawful for the offence of escaping from lawful custody to be sustained.
- 02
Magistrates Courts Act, Section 131(2) and Section 134(5)
A court must inquire of the accused if he wishes to say anything in mitigation before passing sentence.
- 03
Magistrates Courts Act, Section 134(5)
Sentencing must be based on relevant and lawful considerations, and reasons must be recorded.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The conviction for escaping from lawful custody cannot stand where the underlying custody has been quashed for being unlawful. The substratum of the offence disappears when the original conviction and sentence are set aside. Furthermore, the trial court failed to afford the accused an opportunity to mitigate sentence and imposed a sentence based on irrelevant considerations, violating principles of fair trial and natural justice. Both the conviction and sentence are set aside, and the accused is ordered to remain at liberty.
Obiter and limits
- No sentence ought to be passed without inquiring of the accused if he had anything to say in mitigation.
- Mob justice and the fact that few criminals are arrested are not relevant considerations in sentencing.
- An option of a fine should be considered for misdemeanors after inquiry into the accused's means.
Court disposition
conviction and sentence set aside; accused discharged
- The charge of escaping from lawful custody is dismissed.
- Conviction and sentence are set aside.
- The accused is forthwith to remain at liberty.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph
Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0} {\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid67698703\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li360\jclisttab\tx360\lin360 }{\listname ;}\listid1417750905}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1417750905\listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid7622230}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.6568;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author Fredrick Egonda-Ntende}{\operator Harry Mak} {\creatim\yr2006\mo2\dy7\hr10\min14}{\revtim\yr2006\mo2\dy7\hr10\min14}{\printim\yr1999\mo8\dy24\hr17\min44}{\version2}{\edmins0}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords1124}{\nofchars6413}{\*\company High Court of
Uganda}{\nofcharsws7522}{\vern24579}} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow0 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale75\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\nojkernpunct\rsidroot7622230 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 { \insrsid7622230 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid7622230 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid7622230 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid7622230 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid7622230 PAGE }}{\fldrslt
{\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid7622230 1}}}{\cs16\insrsid7622230 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid7622230 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT MASAKA DISTRICT REGISTRY \par \par HIGH COURT REVISIONAL CAUSE NO. MSK-00-CR-CV-0014 OF 1999 \par \par (Arising from Original Criminal Case No. Semb. 0002 of 1999) \par \par Uganda Prosecution \par \par Versus \par \par Katende Kasmoni Accused \par \par \par }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 BEFORE: THE
HONOURABLE MR. FMS EGONDA-NTENDE \par \par REVISIONAL ORDER \par }{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 The accused, Katende Kasmoni, was charged with the offence of escaping from lawful custody contrary to Section 103 of the Penal Code Act in the magistrate grade 11 court at Sembabule. The particulars of the offence were that Katende Simon on the 26}{\lang1033\langfe1033\super\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 th}{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 day of November, 1998 at Lwemiyaga Administration Prison in Ssembabule D istrict being under the custody of No. 0014 Sgt. Sembatya escaped. The accused initially denied the charge. Three months later he changed his plea to guilty and was convicted and sentenced to twelve months imprisonment. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 2.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 This file was
subsequently forwarded to the High Court by the Chief Magistrate with the following remarks. }{\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 " The above file is forwarded to your Lordship for revision on the following grounds: (1) The reasons given f or sentence are grossly irregular hence the sentence of 12 months was not based on good reasons. (2) Accused was not given a fair hearing as he was not given a chance to mitigate his penalty hence the 12 months. (3) The plea was not properly recorded as it is apparent the accused was not made to understand the charge." \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 3.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 At the hearing of this matter Mr. Khaukha learned Resident Senior State Attorney, appearing for the state, submitted that the plea taken was properly taken in this case. He, however, submitted that the sentence in this case was excessive. Before the change of plea on 11}{\lang1033\langfe1033\super\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 th}{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 March 1999, the accused had been in custody since 5}{ \lang1033\langfe1033\super\langnp1033\insrsid7622230
th}{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 March 1999. Given the fact that the offence was a misdemeanor the trial court ought to have given the accused an option of a fine or lesser time of imprisonment. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 4.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 I drew the attention of Mr. Khaukha to the fact that custody in which the accused is supposed to have escaped from had just been quashed following the quashing of the plea, conviction and sentence in High Court Revisional Cause No. MSK-00-CR-CV-0015 of 1999, Uganda versus Kasimoni Katende. The plea in that case was found to be equivocal. Mr. Khaukha replied that for as long as the conviction and sentence stood, and had not been set aside, escaping from such custody, amounted to escaping from lawful custody. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 5.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 The key element to the offence of escaping from lawful
custody is that custody must be established to have been lawful. On the face of it in the instant case by the time the accused escaped, he was serving a sentence of imprisonment ordered by cour t. It turns out that before this revisional cause was heard, the original sentence and originating conviction were set aside for being bad in law. I think the substratum of the offence of escaping from lawful custody has now disap peared as the custody from which the prisoner is supposed to have escaped has been dissolved for being bad in law. I am unable to continue holding the accused to that charge and subsequent conviction. I would set aside the conviction in this case. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 6.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 I now turn to the proceedings for sentence. The trial court just heard from the prosecutor and then proceeded to pass sentence. The trial court did not inquire of the accused if he had anything he wished to say. He just proceeded to order a sentence he thought appropriate in the circumstances. This was irregular and highly undesirable. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 7.\tab}}\pard \ql
\fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 Section 134 (5) of the Magistrates Courts Act, 1970 states, }{\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 "The judgment in the case of a conviction shall be followed by a note of the steps taken by the court prior to sentence and by a note of the senten ce passed together with the reasons for the sentence when there are special reasons for passing a particular sentence." \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 8.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 Section 131 (2) of the Magistrates Courts Act, 1970 states, }{\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 " The court, before passing sentence, may make such inquiries as it thinks f it in order to inform itself as to the sentence proper to be passed and may inquire into the character and antecedents of the accused person and may take into consideration either at the request of the prosecution or the accused person in assessing the pr oper sentence to be
passed such character and antecedents including any other offences admitted by him whether or not he has been convicted of such offences: \'85\'85." \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 9.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}}\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 Although the immediate foregoing provision is not couched in mandatory terms, in my view, no sentence ought to be passed without inquiring of the accused if he had anything to say in mitigation or otherwise before the court proceeded to pass sentence. In any case where, in our adversarial setting, one side is heard on a matter, the principles of fair trial and natural justice require that the other side be heard in respect of the same matter. The trial court ought to have given the accused an opportunity to be heard in the matter of sentence and then recorded as required by Section 134 (5) of the Magistrates Courts Act, all that the accused said in the matter. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 10.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}} \aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0
{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 Having failed to do so will result in the sentence being set aside. Accordingly, I would set aside the sentence imposed by the trial court. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 11.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}} \aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 In its reasons for sentence in this case, the trial court stated, }{ \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 " The act of running from Prison is a dangerous one especially when one is serving a sentence of stealing cattle. People in our society are fed up with criminals, few are arrested and brought to justice the many unfortunate end up being kille d by mobs. I thus sentence the accused to serve 12 months imprisonment."}{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 I agree that the act of escaping from prison is dangerous. I am not sure if this is more so if one is serving a sentence of stealing cattle. Mob justice and the fact that few criminal s are arrested were not relevant considerations in sentencing this particular accused person. The court did not attempt to show their relevance to the order it made. I think this sentence was imposed based on the wrong reasons. I
would set aside the sentence for that reason too. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 12.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}} \aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 In the circumstances of this case I agree with the learned Resident Senior State Attorney that a sentence of 12 months imprisonment was exc essive and harsh. The offence the accused was convicted of was a misdemeanor. An option of a fine should have been considered by the trial court after inquiry into, among other things, the means of the accused to pay . As I have set aside the conviction, it is not necessary to proceed with sentence in this regard. \par {\pntext\pard\plain\hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 13.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li360\ri0\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnsp120\pnhang {\pntxta .}} \aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin360\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 The charge of escaping from lawful custody is dismissed, conviction and sentence are set aside, and the accused is forthwith to remain at liberty.
\par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 \par Dated, Signed and Delivered this 25}{\lang1033\langfe1033\super\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 th}{\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\insrsid7622230 day of August 1999. \par \par \par \par \par \par FMS Egonda-Ntende \par Judge \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.