Share
Uganda v Bagorogoza John & Anor (HCT-05-CR-SC-0027 of 2003) [2004] UGHC 22 (12 August 2004)
- Citation
- [2004] UGHC 22
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Case number
- HCT-05-CR-SC-0027 of 2003
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Case number
- HCT-05-CR-SC-0027 of 2003
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that theft and violence were proved beyond reasonable doubt, as the stolen items were identified and witnesses testified to the assault on the victims. However, the prosecution failed to prove the use or threat of a deadly weapon, as neither a gun nor a panga was recovered and the evidence was inconclusive. Regarding participation, A2's alibi was not disproved and no evidence placed him at the scene, resulting in his acquittal. For A1, circumstantial evidence, including possession of the recently stolen mattress and footmarks leading from the victim's house to his, was sufficient to disprove his alibi and establish his participation. The court applied the doctrine of recent possession and found A1 guilty of simple robbery under sections 285 and 286(1)(b) of the Penal Code Act, while acquitting A2.
Court disposition
A1 convicted of simple robbery; A2 acquitted.
Orders
- A1 (Bagorogoza John) is convicted of simple robbery contrary to Section 285 and 286(1)(b) of the Penal Code Act.
- A2 (Kabareebe Emmanuel) is acquitted and discharged.
02
Material facts
Parties
Uganda
ApplicantBagorogoza John
DefendantKabareebe Emmanuel
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Value of Stolen Cash: UGX 101,500
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether theft occurred during the alleged robbery.
- 02
Whether violence or threat of violence was used in the commission of the offence.
- 03
Whether a deadly weapon was used or threatened to be used.
- 04
Whether the accused persons participated in the crime.
- 05
Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The prosecution argued that both accused, together with others still at large, robbed Yoweri Kigandeire of a mattress, a pair of bed sheets, and shs.101,500/= cash, using deadly weapons (a gun and pangas) immediately before and after the robbery. Five witnesses were called to prove the case, and circumstantial evidence was relied upon to connect the accused to the crime, including possession of recently stolen property and footmarks leading from the victim's house to that of A1.
- Respondent
- Both accused denied involvement in the robbery and made statements on oath. A2 raised an alibi, stating he was never at the scene, and argued that the prosecution failed to adduce evidence placing him at the scene. The defence disputed the identification of the mattress and challenged the sufficiency of the prosecution's evidence, particularly regarding the alleged use of deadly weapons and the connection of the accused to the crime.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Oketh Okale Vs R [1965] EA 555
The prosecution bears the burden to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt; the accused is not required to prove innocence.
- 02
Simon Musoke Vs R [1958] EA 715
Circumstantial evidence must be incompatible with innocence and incapable of explanation upon any other reasonable hypothesis than that of guilt.
- 03
Andrea Obonyo & Others Vs R [1962] EA
Recent possession of stolen property raises a presumption of guilt unless satisfactorily explained.
- 04
General principle of criminal law
Where an accused sets up an alibi, the prosecution must disprove it by adducing evidence placing the accused at the scene.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that theft and violence were proved beyond reasonable doubt, as the stolen items were identified and witnesses testified to the assault on the victims. However, the prosecution failed to prove the use or threat of a deadly weapon, as neither a gun nor a panga was recovered and the evidence was inconclusive. Regarding participation, A2's alibi was not disproved and no evidence placed him at the scene, resulting in his acquittal. For A1, circumstantial evidence, including possession of the recently stolen mattress and footmarks leading from the victim's house to his, was sufficient to disprove his alibi and establish his participation. The court applied the doctrine of recent possession and found A1 guilty of simple robbery under sections 285 and 286(1)(b) of the Penal Code Act, while acquitting A2.
Obiter and limits
- The identification of property by a spouse is valid where the owner is deceased and the spouse is familiar with the property.
- The failure to recover a deadly weapon or exhibit does not automatically negate the possibility of its use, but the prosecution must prove its use beyond reasonable doubt.
- Running away from the scene or upon approach by authorities may be indicative of guilt but is not conclusive without supporting evidence.
Court disposition
A1 convicted of simple robbery; A2 acquitted.
- A1 (Bagorogoza John) is convicted of simple robbery contrary to Section 285 and 286(1)(b) of the Penal Code Act.
- A2 (Kabareebe Emmanuel) is acquitted and discharged.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;} {\f2\fmodern\fcharset0\fprq1{\*\panose 02070309020205020404}Courier New;}{\f3\froman\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05050102010706020507}Symbol;}{\f10\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 05000000000000000000}Wingdings;} {\f35\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Tahoma;}{\f40\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f41\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f43\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;} {\f44\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f45\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f46\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f47\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;} {\f48\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}{\f60\fmodern\fcharset238\fprq1 Courier New CE;}{\f61\fmodern\fcharset204\fprq1 Courier New Cyr;}{\f63\fmodern\fcharset161\fprq1 Courier New Greek;} {\f64\fmodern\fcharset162\fprq1 Courier New Tur;}{\f65\fmodern\fcharset177\fprq1 Courier New (Hebrew);}{\f66\fmodern\fcharset178\fprq1 Courier New (Arabic);}{\f67\fmodern\fcharset186\fprq1 Courier New Baltic;} {\f68\fmodern\fcharset163\fprq1 Courier New (Vietnamese);}{\f390\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Tahoma CE;}{\f391\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2
Tahoma Cyr;}{\f393\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Tahoma Greek;}{\f394\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Tahoma Tur;} {\f395\fswiss\fcharset177\fprq2 Tahoma (Hebrew);}{\f396\fswiss\fcharset178\fprq2 Tahoma (Arabic);}{\f397\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Tahoma Baltic;}{\f398\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Tahoma (Vietnamese);}{\f399\fswiss\fcharset222\fprq2 Tahoma (Thai);}} {\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0; \red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\s1\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\s3\qc \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 3;}{\s4\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1 \keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel3\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\b\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 4;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Title;}{\s16\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Body Text;}{\s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 footer;}{\*\cs18 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid-2112482190\listhybrid{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat16\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid425231960\'01-;}{\levelnumbers;}\loch\af0\hich\af0\dbch\af0\fbias0
\fi-360\li720\jclisttab\tx720\lin720 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid67698691\'01o;}{\levelnumbers;}\f2\fbias0 \fi-360\li1440\jclisttab\tx1440\lin1440 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698693 \'01\u-3929 ?;}{\levelnumbers;}\f10\fbias0 \fi-360\li2160\jclisttab\tx2160\lin2160 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698689\'01\u-3913 ?;}{\levelnumbers;} \f3\fbias0 \fi-360\li2880\jclisttab\tx2880\lin2880 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698691\'01o;}{\levelnumbers;}\f2\fbias0 \fi-360\li3600 \jclisttab\tx3600\lin3600 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698693\'01\u-3929 ?;}{\levelnumbers;}\f10\fbias0 \fi-360\li4320\jclisttab\tx4320\lin4320 } {\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698689\'01\u-3913 ?;}{\levelnumbers;}\f3\fbias0 \fi-360\li5040\jclisttab\tx5040\lin5040
}{\listlevel\levelnfc23 \levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698691\'01o;}{\levelnumbers;}\f2\fbias0 \fi-360\li5760\jclisttab\tx5760\lin5760 }{\listlevel\levelnfc23\levelnfcn23\leveljc0\leveljcn0 \levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698693\'01\u-3929 ?;}{\levelnumbers;}\f10\fbias0 \fi-360\li6480\jclisttab\tx6480\lin6480 }{\listname ;}\listid1406415212}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1406415212 \listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid10450959}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author zkyarisiima}{\operator owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr13\min17}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr13\min17} {\printim\yr2006\mo7\dy6\hr12\min36}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages10}{\nofwords1082}{\nofchars6174}{\*\company Acer Customer}{\nofcharsws7242}{\vern24689}} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nojkernpunct\rsidroot10450959 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs18\insrsid10450959 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs18\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid10450959 10}}}{\cs18\insrsid10450959 \par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid10450959 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta
.}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par }\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT RUKUNGIRI \par }\pard\plain \s4\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel3\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\insrsid10450959 CASE NO: HCT-05-CR-SC-0027 OF 2003 \par }\pard\plain \s1\ql \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 UGANDA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PROSECUTOR \par
}\pard\plain \s3\qc \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel2\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 VERSUS \par }\pard\plain \s1\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 A1. BAGOROGOZA JOHN \} \par }\pard \s1\ql \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 A2.\tab KABAREEBE EMMANUEL \}:::::::::::::::: ACCUSED \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 \par }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 BEFORE: }{\b\f35\fs32\ul\insrsid10450959 HON. MR. JUSTICE PAUL K. MUGAMBA \par }{\b\f35\fs32\ul\insrsid10450959 \par }{\b\f35\fs32\ul\insrsid10450959 JUDGMENT}{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 :- \par }{\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 Both Bagorogoza John (A1) and Kabareebe Emmanuel (A2) are charged with aggravated robbery, contrary to sections 285 and 286 (2) of the Penal Code Act. \par \par }\pard\plain \s16\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 It is the prosecution case that the two together with othe rs still at large robbed Yoweri Kigandeire of a mattress, a pair of bed sheets and shs.101,500/= cash and that at the time immediately before and immediately after the robbery they used deadly weapons which were a gun and pangas. The prosecution called f i ve witnesses to prove its case. PW1 was Makoma Joseph AIP, PW2 was Samali Tamazariro, PW3 was Twinomwanya Emmanuel, PW4 was Karugaba Nathan while PW5 was Emmanuel Tumuhimbise. Medical evidence sought to be relied on by the prosecution was abandoned afte r the report was found lacking the identity of the person who made it. \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 \par In their defence both accused made statements on oath denying involvement. They called no witnesses. \par \par The prosecution has the onus to prove the case against any of the accused person beyond reasonable doubt. It is not the duty for the accused person to prove his innocence. See }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 Oketh Okale Vs R [1965] EA 555. }{ \f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 In the instant case the prosecution ought to prove the following
ingredients:-}{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 \par }\pard\plain \s16\qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f35\fs32\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid10450959 (i) That there was theft. \par (ii) That there was violence or threat to use violence. \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 (iii) That there was violence or threat to use violence. \par (iv) That a deadly weapon was used or threatened to \par be used, and \par (v) That both the accused or any of them were responsible. \par \par The first ingredient concer ns theft. According to the indictment a mattress, a pair of bed sheets and shs.101,500/= cash were stolen from Late Kigandeire and PW2. In her testimony PW2 stated that a mattress, a pair of bed sheets and shs.101,500/= cash were stolen. In court PW2 i d entified the mattress produced in court as one which Late Kigandeire, her husband, used to sleep on. She testified that a mattress was stolen the night they were attacked by robbers. Counsel for the defence disputes the identification saying as the matt ress belonged to Late Kigandeire PW2 was not the right person to identify it to court. \par \par Respectfully I do not agree. She was wife to the
owner of the mattress who has since died and if any wonder it would be if she failed to identify the family mattress. Since the mattress was taken away and recovered elsewhere I am satisfied the prosecution has proved the first ingredient beyond reasonable doubt. \par \par The next ingredient to prove by the prosecution is that there was violence. PW2 was witness to the attack by robbers. She testified that both she and her husband were assaulted by the robbers. PW3 testified that both Kigandeire and PW2 had been badly assaulted and that property had been scattered all over the place when he visited the scene. PW4 had heard an
alarm raised by PW2 and her husband and when he answered it, he was told by both Kigandeire and PW2, that the assailants had assaulted them. PW5 also testified that he had found both PW2 and her husband had been assaulted. From the above I am satisfied that there was use of violence on that occasion. \par \par The prosecution must prove that a deadly weapon was used or threatened to be used on that occasion. According to PW1 a spent cartridge with powder was recovered from the house of A1. This piece of evidence was never exhibited. PW2 who was present at the time of the attack testified that, she was slapped by the intruders with something she thought was a panga. She does not exactly say she saw a panga or pangas. No panga was recovered as a matter of fact. PW2 said further that the intruders had a gun which they used to assault her. No gun was recovered and none was fired at the scene. From the above evidence I do not find the prosecution had proved this ingredient beyond reasonable doubt. \par \par Finally the pro secution must prove that the accused persons or any of them participated in the crime. None of the accused persons was identified at the scene. The evidence the prosecution goes by is circumstantial. Mere evidence is circumstantial in order to justify an inference of guilt the inculpatory facts must be incompatible with the innocence of the accused and incapable
of explanation upon any other reasonable hypotheses them that of guilt. See }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 Simon Musoke Vs R [1958] EA 715.}{ \f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 \par \par The reason A2 was arrested and c harged is because A1 after being arrested had mentioned him as his accomplice. A2 denies involvement and says he was never at the scene. When an accused person sets up a defence of alibi it is not his responsibility to prove it. The prosecution must di sprove the alibi by adducing evidence which places accused squarely at the scene of crime. \par \par In this case the prosecution has not adduced evidence connecting A2 to the offence. His alibi has not been disproved at all. \par \par Concerning A1, PW1 testified that he saw footmarks leading from Kigandeire\rquote s house to that of A1, a distance of more than 1 kilometre. PW3 also testified that he saw footmarks leading from the house of Kigandeire to that of A1. it was the evidence of PW3 that the mattress exhibit P2 was re covered in the house of A1 laid between two other mattresses. The exhibit is that mattress which PW2 identified as one stolen from their house the previous night. PW4 also testified that they had found exhibit P2 in the bedroom of A1. It was the eviden c e of PW4 that he had earlier seen Kigandeire sleeping on exhibit P2 and the witness had immediately recognized it at the house of A1. When a person
is found to be in possession of property which had been stolen recently he is regarded as one who had stol en it unless he gives a satisfactory explanation of how that property came to be in his possession. See }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 Andrea Obonyo & Others Vs R [1962]. }{\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 There has been no explanation by A1 who at the time of the recovery of the mattress from his house had run away as to how he came to be in possession of a mattress belonging to Kigandeire. As the mattress had been stolen only the previous night A1 was in possession of recently stolen property. \par \par There is evidence of PW3, PW4 and PW5 showing that accused had been running away from his house after he saw them. This shows that A1 felt guilty. \par The defence of A1 also is of alibi. It is not his duty to prove the alibi but the prosecution has the responsibility to disprove it by adducing evidence which places accused at the scene of crime. As accused was found in possession of recently stolen property without him giving satisfactory explanation I find the alibi disproved. I find A1 participated in the crime alleged. \par \par The assessors in their joint opinion advised me to convic t A1 as charged and to acquit A2. For the reasons I have given in the course of this judgment I do not agree wholly with that opinion. I find A1 guilty of Simple Robbery Contrary to Section 285
and 286 (1) (b) of the Penal Code Act and convict him accor dingly. I find A2 not guilty and acquit him. \par \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 PAUL K. MUGAMBA \par JUDGE \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 12}{\b\f35\fs32\super\insrsid10450959 th }{\b\f35\fs32\insrsid10450959 August 2004. \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.