Share
Tumubweinee and 5 Others v Kiggundu (Civil Suit 96 of 2023) [2023] UGHC 120 (8 November 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] UGHC 120
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Matovu, J
- Case number
- Civil Suit 96 of 2023
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Matovu, J
- Case number
- Civil Suit 96 of 2023
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the Counter defendant, having withdrawn his main suit and related applications and having failed to respond to the Counter claim despite proper service, is deemed to have admitted the claims against him. The only evidence before the court was that of Tumubweinee Raymond, which established the Counter claimants' entitlement to the lifting of the caveat on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 and to costs. The court saw no reason to deny the orders sought, especially as the land is registered in the Counter claimants' names. Accordingly, the caveat lodged by the Counter defendant is ordered to be lifted and costs awarded to the Counter claimants.
Court disposition
counterclaim allowed
Orders
- The caveat lodged by the Counter defendant on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 land at Naatogonya II vide Instrument No MKO-00142836 is hereby lifted.
- Costs of the Counter claim are awarded to the Counter claimants.
02
Material facts
Parties
Tumubweinee Christine Nyarubona
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziTwinemanzi Tumubweinee
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziTumubweinee Roy Richard
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziTumubweinee Raymond
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziTumubweinee Ronnie Manzi
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziPhilippa Tumubweinee Nyakato
Applicant Counsel: Atwine MuhweziKiggundu Bonny
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Land Area Affected: 143.35
03
Procedural history
Posture
Counterclaim / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the caveat lodged by the Counter defendant on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 should be lifted.
- 02
Whether the Counter claimants are entitled to costs of the Counter claim.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Counsel for the Counter claimants argued that the caveat on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 was unlawfully lodged by the Counter defendant and should be lifted. He further prayed for an award of general damages for mental anguish suffered by the Counter claimants due to the caveat.
- Respondent
- The Counter defendant did not file any response to the Counter claim despite being duly served. No arguments were presented on his behalf.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Murad Samnani and Another Versus Salim Jiwani Commercial Court Miscellaneous Application No. 841 of 2016
Failure to file a response to a counterclaim amounts to admission of its contents.
- 02
Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act
Costs follow the event and are awarded to the successful party.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the Counter defendant, having withdrawn his main suit and related applications and having failed to respond to the Counter claim despite proper service, is deemed to have admitted the claims against him. The only evidence before the court was that of Tumubweinee Raymond, which established the Counter claimants' entitlement to the lifting of the caveat on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 and to costs. The court saw no reason to deny the orders sought, especially as the land is registered in the Counter claimants' names. Accordingly, the caveat lodged by the Counter defendant is ordered to be lifted and costs awarded to the Counter claimants.
Obiter and limits
- Withdrawal of the main suit and related applications by the Counter defendant further confirms his lack of contest to the Counter claim.
- The court proceeded ex parte due to the Counter defendant's failure to respond, ensuring procedural fairness to the Counter claimants.
Court disposition
counterclaim allowed
- The caveat lodged by the Counter defendant on Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 land at Naatogonya II vide Instrument No MKO-00142836 is hereby lifted.
- Costs of the Counter claim are awarded to the Counter claimants.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT MUKONO
CIVIL SUIT NO. 096 OF 2023
1. TUMUBWEINEE CHRISTINE NYARUBONA
2. TWINEMANZI TUMUBWEINEE
3. TUMUBWEINEE ROY RICHARD
4. TUMUBWEINEE RAYMOND
5. TUMUBWEINEE RONNIE MANZI
6. PHILIPPA TUMUBWEINEE NYAKATO ...: COUNTERCLAIMANTS (Administrators of the Estate of the late Tumubweinee Ephraim Manzi)
VERSUS
KIGGUNDU BONNY :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
BEFORE: HONOURABLE JUSTICE DAVID MATOVU
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. Tumubweinee Christine Nyarubona, Twinemanzi Tumubweinee, Tumubweinee Roy Richard, Tumubweinee Raymond, Tumubweinee Ronnie Manzi and Philippa Tumubweinee Nyakato (hereinafter referred to as the "Counter claimants") filed a Counter claim to Civil Suit No. 096 of 2023 in the High Court of Uganda at Mukono against Kiggundu
Bonny (hereinafter referred to as the "Counter defendant") seeking interlia the lifting of a caveat lodged on the land at Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 land at Naantogonya II vide Instrument No MKO-00-142836 lodged on 24<sup>th</sup> February, 2023 by the Counter defendant.
Legal representation
2. Mr. Atwine Muhwezi represented the Counter claimants and the Counter defendant was not represented as he did not file a response to this Counter claim despise being duly served with the same on 16<sup>th</sup> June, 2023.
Background facts
- 3. The Counter defendant filed Civil Suit No. 096 of 2023 in the High Court of Uganda at Mukono against the Counter claimants seeking several declaratory orders, a permanent injunction, an eviction order, general damages, punitive damages and costs of the suit. - 4. The Counter claimants filed a written statement of defence with a Counterclaim on 26<sup>th</sup> May, 2023 and according to the affidavit of Akatuhwera Simon the defence and Counterclaim was served
upon Counsel for the Counter defendant on 16<sup>th</sup> June, 2023 but they did not file a response to the Counterclaim.
- 5. On 6<sup>th</sup> November, 2023 Mr. Timothy Mucunguzi appeared before Court holding brief for Mr. Arthur Mwebesa with instructions to withdraw Civil Suit No. 096 of 2023 and Court allowed the withdrawal of Civil Suit No. 096 of 2023 with costs to the defendants/Counter claimants. - 6. Court noted that by Counsel Timothy Mucunguzi conceding to the payment of costs in Civil Suit No. 096 of 2023 he by implication confirmed that the Plaintiff/Counter defendant was duly served with a written statement of defence and counter claim hence the order to proceed with hearing the Counter claim exparte.
Evidence of the Counter claimants
7. The Counter claimants relied on the evidence of Tumubweine Raymond who stated that he was in Court to have a caveat on their land at Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 land at Naatogonya lodged by the Counter defendant lifted. He also prayed for costs of the Counter claim.
Arguments by Counsel for the Counterclaimants
8. Mr. Atwine Muhweezi briefly implored Court to lift the caveat and also award general damages for mental anguish on the Counter claimants by the Counter defendant.
Decision of Court
- 9. Court notes that the Counter defendant filed Miscellaneous Applications No.160 and 161 of 2023 which applications he withdrew as he did to his main suit No. 096 of 2023 and since he did not file a response to the Counter claim Court finds that the Counter defendant admitted the contents of the Counter claim against him. See case of Murad Samnani and Another Versus Salim Jiwani Commercial Court Miscellaneous Application No. 841 of 2016. - $10.$ The evidence of Tumubweinee Raymond only referred to the lifting of the caveat on land at Bugerere Block 100 Plot 822 and costs of the Counter claim. - $11.$ Court finds no reason to deny the Counter claimants this order relating to 143.3460 Hectares of land at Freehold Register Volume MKO 2202 Folio 21 Plot 822 Block 100 Land at
Naatogonya II which land is registered in the names of the Counter claimants on 22<sup>nd</sup> August, 2022 vide Instrument No MKO 00131311.
- Court therefore orders for the lifting of the caveat by the 12. Counter defendant on the land described hereinabove which caveat was lodged on 24<sup>th</sup> February, 2023 vide Instrument No MKO-00142836. - Court also awards costs of the Counter claim to the 13. Counter claimants.
Dated this... .......day of ...................................
David Matovu Judge
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.