Download

Uganda Judgment

Commercial Court of Uganda

Trackstar (U) Limited v Global 6c Star Logistics Limited (Civil Suit No. 397 of 2018) [2021] UGCommC 131 (30 April 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the judgment delivered on 30th April 2021 contained a clerical error in the amount of special damages awarded, which was stated as USD 55,943 instead of the correct sum of USD 228,516. Relying on Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act, which empowers the court to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments or orders at any time, the court exercised its inherent power to amend the judgment to reflect the correct amount of special damages claimed and awarded to the plaintiff. The correction was made to ensure that the judgment accurately represents the court's intention and the parties' entitlements as established by the evidence and pleadings.

Court disposition

judgment_corrected

Orders

  • The judgment delivered on 30th April 2021 is corrected to reflect the special damages awarded as USD 228,516 instead of USD 55,943.
  • All references to special damages in the judgment are amended accordingly.

02

Material facts

Parties

Trackstar Uganda Limited

Plaintiff

Global 6C Star Logistics Limited

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Special Damages Awarded: USD 228,516

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Correction of Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff sought correction of a clerical error in the judgment, asserting that the special damages awarded were incorrectly stated as USD 55,943 instead of the correct sum of USD 228,516.
Respondent
The defendant's position is not recorded in the correction order; the correction was made on the court's own motion under its inherent powers.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 100, Civil Procedure Act Cap 71

    Courts have the inherent power to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments or orders at any time.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the judgment delivered on 30th April 2021 contained a clerical error in the amount of special damages awarded, which was stated as USD 55,943 instead of the correct sum of USD 228,516. Relying on Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act, which empowers the court to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments or orders at any time, the court exercised its inherent power to amend the judgment to reflect the correct amount of special damages claimed and awarded to the plaintiff. The correction was made to ensure that the judgment accurately represents the court's intention and the parties' entitlements as established by the evidence and pleadings.

Court disposition

judgment_corrected

  • The judgment delivered on 30th April 2021 is corrected to reflect the special damages awarded as USD 228,516 instead of USD 55,943.
  • All references to special damages in the judgment are amended accordingly.

Source and reliance status

Commercial Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Commercial Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2021] UGCommC 131

*THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA*

![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA*

*(COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION)*

*CIVIL SUIT NO. 397 OF 2018*

*TRACKSTAR UGANDA LIMITED……………………………………………………....................... PLAINTIFF*

*VS.*

*GLOBAL 6C STAR LOGISTICS LIMITED ……................................................................ DEFENDANT*

*BEFORE HON. JUSTICE RICHARD WEJULI WABWIRE*

*(CORRECTION OF ERROR IN JUDGMENT)*

*S100, THE CIVIL PROCEDURE ACT CAP 71*

*In the Judgment delivered in this matter by this Court on 30th April 2021, there was an error when the special damages claimed and awarded were stated to be USD\$55,943. The correct sum is US\$228,516.*

*Premised on the inherent power of the Court derived from Section 100 of the CPA, the Judgment delivered on the 30th April 2021 is corrected at page 10, line 166 regarding special damages to reflect the correct sum of damages claimed by the Plaintiffs, being USD\$ 228,516 and not USD\$ 55,943.*

*The special damages awarded as reflected at Page 11, line 179 is accordingly corrected as well to reflect the sum of USD\$228,516.*

*Delivered at Kampala this 30th day of April, 2021.*

*………………………………………………………*

*RICHARD WEJULI WABWIRE*

*JUDGE*

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 100, Civil Procedure Act Cap 71

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.